
5 Aug
2012
5 Aug
'12
9:48 a.m.
FYI, I used the same probe radius for both calculations and set the cut off to zero. -----Original Message----- From: Elaine Meng [mailto:meng@cgl.ucsf.edu] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 12:43 PM To: Nikolay Igorovich Rodionov Cc: chimera-users@cgl.ucsf.edu BB Subject: Re: [Chimera-users] SASA vs. MSA On Aug 5, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Elaine Meng wrote:
However, if you are looking at contributions to SES and SAS >N square angstroms where N>0, because the SAS is farther out from the atomic centers and thus larger in magnitude, that will select more atoms for SAS.
Actually it depends on the value of N. The statement above applies when N is reasonably large, ~15 square angstroms or greater. Elaine