Maybe @<TRIPOS>COMMENT would be a better place for them?
http://tripos.com/data/support/mol2.pdf 
----
Pozdrawiam,  |  Best regards,
Maciek Wójcikowski
maciek@wojcikowski.pl


W dniu 4 kwietnia 2012 20:08 użytkownik Conrad Huang <conrad@cgl.ucsf.edu> napisał:
Our approach to file formats in Chimera is to support the "native" form from the developers.  The use of ########## for Dock mol2 format is obviously easiest for us since it is in use and already works in Chimera, but we're happy to accommodate a more broadly useful format.

Conrad


On 4/3/12 2:22 PM, Maciek Wójcikowski wrote:
For Chimera reference check out file
UCSF-Chimera-XXX/share/ViewDock/Compound.py You can see many versions of
Dock, I reckon latest is the one we need. Anyhow since 4, dock uses the
same comment method. This comments are only used by ViewDock module, as
far as I know.

For Dock reference you can see dock6/src/dock/library_file.cpp it seams
fairy simple and always uses ##########.
----
Pozdrawiam,  |  Best regards,
Maciek Wójcikowski
maciek@wojcikowski.pl <mailto:maciek@wojcikowski.pl>



W dniu 3 kwietnia 2012 21:13 użytkownik Scott Brozell
<sbrozell@rci.rutgers.edu <mailto:sbrozell@rci.rutgers.edu>> napisał:


   Hi,

   This is a good suggestion.

   But before implementation,
   1) do the DOCK developers or users have any comments ?
   2) do the Chimera developers or users have any comments ?
     In particular, does Chimera use ########## as the lexeme for the
   DOCK token ?
     It might be useful to have a consistent lexeme across programs.
     Or maybe the Babel folks have comments on what would be a more
   general tag ?

   thanks,
   scott

   On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 05:40:46PM +0200, Maciek Wójcikowski wrote:
    > Here you have two example files
    > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6846289/1afk_ligand_conformers.mol2
    > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6846289/3h78_ligand_conformers.mol2
    >
    > What OB should do (in my mind) is to take "Name:" value as target
   molecule
    > name and pass all 3 grid scores (total, vdw and ele) somehow (i guess
    > comment is a right place, since there is not much choice), so
   that it can
    > output it in simmilar manner.
    >
    > Maybe it would be easier to have an option "d" (aka. dock) which
   would copy
    > ALL the ###### data, and some other one, such as "s" (aka. sufix)
   to take
    > suffixed name into account. Disadvantage of above is that it
   wouldn't work
    > for other formats.
    > ----
    > Pozdrawiam,  |  Best regards,
    > Maciek Wójcikowski
    > maciek@wojcikowski.pl <mailto:maciek@wojcikowski.pl>

    >
    >
    > W dniu 3 kwietnia 2012 17:23 użytkownik Geoffrey Hutchison <
    > geoff@geoffhutchison.net <mailto:geoff@geoffhutchison.net>> napisał:

    >
    > > > I have a thought about mol2 files form Dock program, which
   contain
    > > > additional information in commentary (###). Those information
   is being
    > > lost
    > > > during openbabel operations, which is a pity. I'd like to
   propose a
    > > in/out
    > > > option for mol2 for Dock'ed mol2's to read/write compatible
   information
    > > from
    > > > those files. Especially conformer ID is important for further
   anylisis.
    > > > Simmilar approach is used with pdbqt's contained in
   Autodock's .dlg
    > > files.
    > >
    > >
    > > If you can give us a selection of example files and a list of what
    > > information you'd like retained, it's fairly easy to patch the
   parsers.
    > >
    > > Cheers,
    > > -Geoff




_______________________________________________
Chimera-users mailing list
Chimera-users@cgl.ucsf.edu
http://plato.cgl.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/chimera-users