data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b2ba/0b2ba5e6512da0dfa3962523127847344c4faf27" alt=""
i want to test my understanding about the "circular permuation" during matching: is this for proteins that result from gene duplication? -bryan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efbb2/efbb295d03f662f94c18a6c6b9365d6e78cd26a5" alt=""
Hi Bryan, Several pairs of natural protein structures appear to be related by circular permutation (and many sets have been generated by artificial means). Since these relationships are known to exist, without specifying the mechanism, it is useful for various programs to handle the situation. However, you are correct: gene duplication is one of the processes that might yield circularly permuted proteins. However, it is not the only possibility. Two proteins related by circular permutation might have been generated by fusions of two smaller parts that fused in the opposite order, for example. Here are some reviews: Uliel S, Fliess A, Unger R. Naturally occurring circular permutations in proteins. Protein Eng. 2001 Aug;14(8):533-42. http://peds.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/full/14/8/533 Russell RB, Ponting CP. Protein fold irregularities that hinder sequence analysis. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998 Jun;8(3):364-71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/ query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9666333 I hope this helps, Elaine ----- Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. meng@cgl.ucsf.edu UCSF Computer Graphics Lab and Babbitt Lab Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of California, San Francisco http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/meng/index.html On Wednesday, May 4, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
i want to test my understanding about the "circular permuation" during matching: is this for proteins that result from gene duplication?
-bryan _______________________________________________ Chimera-users mailing list Chimera-users@cgl.ucsf.edu http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/chimera-users
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b2ba/0b2ba5e6512da0dfa3962523127847344c4faf27" alt=""
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Elaine Meng wrote:
However, it is not the only possibility. Two proteins related by circular permutation might have been generated by fusions of two smaller parts that fused in the opposite order, for example. Here are some
interesting - thanks Elaine. by the way, is the sequence alignment widget inacessible when doing e.g. chimera --nogui cmd:input.dat (contents of input.dat): mmaker #0:.b #1:.a alg sw pair bb show true ^^^^^^^^^ ||||||||| N.B. in other words, does mmaker have a keyword to specify an alignment output? -bryan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efbb2/efbb295d03f662f94c18a6c6b9365d6e78cd26a5" alt=""
On Wednesday, May 4, 2005, at 01:12 PM, Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
by the way, is the sequence alignment widget inacessible when doing e.g.
chimera --nogui cmd:input.dat
(contents of input.dat):
mmaker #0:.b #1:.a alg sw pair bb show true ^^^^^^^^^ ||||||||| N.B.
in other words, does mmaker have a keyword to specify an alignment output?
-bryan
Hi Bryan, The "show" keyword specifies that the alignment should be shown with Multalign Viewer, but there is no keyword that says a file should be written out. When you are doing things interactively, you can then use File...Save As (in the Multalign Viewer menu) to save a file. However, in your case it is the python script from Eric that tells chimera to save a file. You probably saw this already, but here is the mmaker man page listing the keywords: http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/1.2065/docs/UsersGuide/midas/mmaker.html Not sure I'm answering your question, though... Elaine
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b2ba/0b2ba5e6512da0dfa3962523127847344c4faf27" alt=""
You probably saw this already, but here is the mmaker man page listing the keywords: http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/1.2065/docs/UsersGuide/midas/mmaker.html
right
Not sure I'm answering your question, though...
you have answered it, thanks. if i haven't yet, i should say thanks for all the help - this is great. um... i was curious... when is the new snapshot release slated to be ready? -bryan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b2ba/0b2ba5e6512da0dfa3962523127847344c4faf27" alt=""
oops - indeed Eric has addressed my question 3 days ago. sorry. however i'd like to ask if mmaker is in fact not written to handle specific stretches of a model - e.g you can do #1:.a at the least? e.g., not something like #1:.a1-10,a15-20... to prune out areas to ignore. -bryan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6afbe/6afbe7577c5a571d04e2d32118581c9ef7f0ad74" alt=""
On May 4, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
um... i was curious... when is the new snapshot release slated to be ready?
Due to the problems we are having with Chimera on Tiger we might be putting out a Tiger release in week or so, provided we can actually solve the problems. For a general release we want to get the replacement surfacing library working, so an absolute best case would be a month and a half, and more likely 2-3 months. If you want the MatchMaker that considers secondary structure in the match, I have that done for the Needleman-Wunsch case and could send you the files involved. They are all Python files so they can just be dropped into your Chimera installation, replacing the old versions of the same files. --Eric
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b2ba/0b2ba5e6512da0dfa3962523127847344c4faf27" alt=""
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Eric Pettersen wrote:
Due to the problems we are having with Chimera on Tiger we might be
didn't we all know that was going to happen? ;^) seriously, i'm sticking with Panther unless i drop my laptop in the ocean.
working, so an absolute best case would be a month and a half, and more
ok, cool with me!
likely 2-3 months. If you want the MatchMaker that considers secondary structure in the match, I have that done for the Needleman-Wunsch case and could send you the files involved. They are all Python files so they can
i'd love to try those out. -bryan
participants (3)
-
Bryan W. Lepore
-
Elaine Meng
-
Eric Pettersen