
I have a multiple vrml models that vary by scale. 1, 10 & 100 I notice the lighting significantly drops off as the scale increases. When I have another model, say PDB, that is in approximate relation (ie, viewable in regards to the volume size similar to the vrml files volumes); the PDB file looks good regardless of size (eg, tRNA or ribosome). I can increase the brightness to compensate (10-20) but it washes out the PDB models when brightness goes beyond 2. is the lighting handled differently between these different types of models? Matthew Dougherty National Center for Macromolecular Imaging Baylor College of Medicine

Hi Matt, Yes the VRML lighting is handled differently in Chimera than lighting for molecules and density maps. As I mentioned before, our VRML implementation is very limited. I guess this includes bad lighting, but I haven’t seen examples. You may want to send an image so we know just what you mean by “lighting drops off”. I have certainly seen many examples in the past where VRML transparency in Chimera looks very bad. Tom On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Dougherty, Matthew T wrote:
I have a multiple vrml models that vary by scale. 1, 10 & 100
I notice the lighting significantly drops off as the scale increases.
When I have another model, say PDB, that is in approximate relation (ie, viewable in regards to the volume size similar to the vrml files volumes); the PDB file looks good regardless of size (eg, tRNA or ribosome).
I can increase the brightness to compensate (10-20) but it washes out the PDB models when brightness goes beyond 2.
is the lighting handled differently between these different types of models?
Matthew Dougherty National Center for Macromolecular Imaging Baylor College of Medicine _______________________________________________ Chimera-users mailing list Chimera-users@cgl.ucsf.edu http://plato.cgl.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/chimera-users
participants (2)
-
Dougherty, Matthew T
-
Tom Goddard