data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25816/25816d75d00c8ed78a01b1190c6a30ba3dc52036" alt=""
hi - here is benchmark result for new version of Chimera. Original benchmark progress log file is attached. Graphics NVidia GeForce Go 7200 Processor Intel Core Duo T2050 Clock (MHz) 533 OS Type Windows Surface 990 Mesh 368 Contour 148 Solid 173 Recolor 87 Notes Laptop Test Date 12/06 Chimera Version 2304 Machine HP Pavilion dv2000t Graphics Memory (Mb) 128 Main Memory (Mb) 1024 OS Version XP Home Driver Version 8.4.6.4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45fd7/45fd70b48f7f7c43c2f3d13baaa798611563261c" alt=""
Hi Daniil, The Chimera surface benchmark you report (990) looks too high to be correct. Probably indicates some OpenGL optimization is circumventing the Chimera timing code -- basically a bug in our Benchmark tool. Could you do the following consistency check. Show the Benchmark dialog (menu entry Tools / Utilities / Benchmark), enter 400 in the "Show standard model, size N" entry field, press the Surface button *below* that entry field. That will show a white cube on your screen. Then click the "Monitor actual frame rate" button. Send me the frame rate it reports. You could also try just running the surface benchmark a few times by pressing the surface button under "Run volume benchmark" and see if it gives a consistent number (to within 5 or 10%). Thanks, Tom
participants (2)
-
Daniil Zaitsev
-
Thomas Goddard