About findclash in detecting overlap of atoms
Hi, I'm trying to use command "findclash" to check the excluded volume effect by detecting overlaps between atoms. The command I use is "findclash #0 test #0" or "findclash #0 overlapCutoff value test #0", but I found that two close atoms (14C,16C, dis=0.8) are not identified as "overlaped" while another two atoms (11C, 16C, dis=1.8) whose distance is larger are overlaped... Is there anything wrong about understanding the overlap? Example molecular (init.mol2): @<TRIPOS>MOLECULE init.mol2 20 19 20 0 0 NUCLEIC_ACID NO_CHARGES @<TRIPOS>ATOM 1 C 14.7888 10.0072 -5.6663 C.3 1 DA 0.0000 2 C 15.4013 8.5150 -3.5012 C.3 2 DA 0.0000 3 C 13.7388 8.7698 -5.6133 C.3 3 DA 0.0000 4 C 14.6414 7.5770 -3.3654 C.3 4 DA 0.0000 5 C 12.9675 5.9273 -2.0359 C.3 5 DA 0.0000 6 C 13.6457 4.0155 -0.2544 C.3 6 DA 0.0000 7 C 12.8822 2.8588 2.0634 C.3 7 DA 0.0000 8 C 11.7541 3.3958 4.4562 C.3 8 DA 0.0000 9 C 11.2290 4.5854 6.8231 C.3 9 DA 0.0000 10 C 13.8907 4.6510 7.2730 C.3 10 DA 0.0000 11 C 15.5581 5.2490 9.3114 C.3 11 DA 0.0000 12 C 17.8150 4.7800 10.7177 C.3 12 DA 0.0000 13 C 18.0666 2.1205 10.3271 C.3 13 DA 0.0000 14 C 16.9288 4.4119 9.4640 C.3 14 DA 0.0000 15 C 14.9471 3.0788 10.7232 C.3 15 DA 0.0000 16 C 16.7345 3.9070 8.8773 C.3 16 DA 0.0000 17 C 15.5384 2.3512 10.7314 C.3 17 DA 0.0000 18 C 16.0476 1.4159 8.2501 C.3 18 DA 0.0000 19 C 17.5152 1.5369 5.9877 C.3 19 DA 0.0000 20 C 17.5650 3.1811 3.8468 C.3 20 DA 0.0000 @<TRIPOS>BOND 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 3 3 4 1 4 4 5 1 5 5 6 1 6 6 7 1 7 7 8 1 8 8 9 1 9 9 10 1 10 10 11 1 11 11 12 1 12 12 13 1 13 13 14 1 14 14 15 1 15 15 16 1 16 16 17 1 17 17 18 1 18 18 19 1 19 19 20 1 @<TRIPOS>SUBSTRUCTURE 1 DA 1 RESIDUE 4 A DA 1 ROOT 2 DA 2 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 3 DA 3 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 4 DA 4 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 5 DA 5 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 6 DA 6 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 7 DA 7 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 8 DA 8 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 9 DA 9 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 10 DA 10 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 11 DA 11 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 12 DA 12 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 13 DA 13 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 14 DA 14 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 15 DA 15 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 16 DA 16 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 17 DA 17 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 18 DA 18 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 19 DA 19 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 20 DA 20 RESIDUE 4 A DA 1 Best Wishes! Jiying Jia
Hi Jiying Jia, The “findclash” default is to ignore interactions between atoms that are separated by 4 or fewer bonds, and this is controlled by the “bondSeparation” option. For example, to ignore only interactions between pairs of atoms that are directly bonded (separated by 1 bond), you would use a command something like: findclash #0 test #0 bondSep 1 … giving results shown in attached image, except I changed the line colors afterwards. You can use command “help findclash” to see the findclash manual page (which explains the options and their default values), or see it on our website here: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera/docs/UsersGuide/midas/findclash.html> I hope this helps, Elaine ----- Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. UCSF Computer Graphics Lab (Chimera team) and Babbitt Lab Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of California, San Francisco On Jul 6, 2016, at 6:38 AM, xibei <zhuceyonghu123@126.com> wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to use command "findclash" to check the excluded volume effect by detecting overlaps between atoms. The command I use is "findclash #0 test #0" or "findclash #0 overlapCutoff value test #0", but I found that two close atoms (14C,16C, dis=0.8) are not identified as "overlaped" while another two atoms (11C, 16C, dis=1.8) whose distance is larger are overlaped... Is there anything wrong about understanding the overlap?
Example molecular (init.mol2): @<TRIPOS>MOLECULE init.mol2 20 19 20 0 0 NUCLEIC_ACID NO_CHARGES
@<TRIPOS>ATOM 1 C 14.7888 10.0072 -5.6663 C.3 1 DA 0.0000 2 C 15.4013 8.5150 -3.5012 C.3 2 DA 0.0000 3 C 13.7388 8.7698 -5.6133 C.3 3 DA 0.0000 4 C 14.6414 7.5770 -3.3654 C.3 4 DA 0.0000 5 C 12.9675 5.9273 -2.0359 C.3 5 DA 0.0000 6 C 13.6457 4.0155 -0.2544 C.3 6 DA 0.0000 7 C 12.8822 2.8588 2.0634 C.3 7 DA 0.0000 8 C 11.7541 3.3958 4.4562 C.3 8 DA 0.0000 9 C 11.2290 4.5854 6.8231 C.3 9 DA 0.0000 10 C 13.8907 4.6510 7.2730 C.3 10 DA 0.0000 11 C 15.5581 5.2490 9.3114 C.3 11 DA 0.0000 12 C 17.8150 4.7800 10.7177 C.3 12 DA 0.0000 13 C 18.0666 2.1205 10.3271 C.3 13 DA 0.0000 14 C 16.9288 4.4119 9.4640 C.3 14 DA 0.0000 15 C 14.9471 3.0788 10.7232 C.3 15 DA 0.0000 16 C 16.7345 3.9070 8.8773 C.3 16 DA 0.0000 17 C 15.5384 2.3512 10.7314 C.3 17 DA 0.0000 18 C 16.0476 1.4159 8.2501 C.3 18 DA 0.0000 19 C 17.5152 1.5369 5.9877 C.3 19 DA 0.0000 20 C 17.5650 3.1811 3.8468 C.3 20 DA 0.0000 @<TRIPOS>BOND 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 3 3 4 1 4 4 5 1 5 5 6 1 6 6 7 1 7 7 8 1 8 8 9 1 9 9 10 1 10 10 11 1 11 11 12 1 12 12 13 1 13 13 14 1 14 14 15 1 15 15 16 1 16 16 17 1 17 17 18 1 18 18 19 1 19 19 20 1 @<TRIPOS>SUBSTRUCTURE 1 DA 1 RESIDUE 4 A DA 1 ROOT 2 DA 2 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 3 DA 3 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 4 DA 4 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 5 DA 5 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 6 DA 6 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 7 DA 7 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 8 DA 8 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 9 DA 9 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 10 DA 10 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 11 DA 11 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 12 DA 12 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 13 DA 13 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 14 DA 14 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 15 DA 15 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 16 DA 16 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 17 DA 17 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 18 DA 18 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 19 DA 19 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 20 DA 20 RESIDUE 4 A DA 1
Best Wishes! Jiying Jia
Oh, I see, thanks very much! 在 2016-07-07 00:31:16，"Elaine Meng" <meng@cgl.ucsf.edu> 写道： Hi Jiying Jia, The “findclash” default is to ignore interactions between atoms that are separated by 4 or fewer bonds, and this is controlled by the “bondSeparation” option. For example, to ignore only interactions between pairs of atoms that are directly bonded (separated by 1 bond), you would use a command something like: findclash #0 test #0 bondSep 1 … giving results shown in attached image, except I changed the line colors afterwards. You can use command “help findclash” to see the findclash manual page (which explains the options and their default values), or see it on our website here: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera/docs/UsersGuide/midas/findclash.html> I hope this helps, Elaine ----- Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. UCSF Computer Graphics Lab (Chimera team) and Babbitt Lab Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of California, San Francisco On Jul 6, 2016, at 6:38 AM, xibei <zhuceyonghu123@126.com> wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use command "findclash" to check the excluded volume effect by detecting overlaps between atoms. The command I use is "findclash #0 test #0" or "findclash #0 overlapCutoff value test #0", but I found that two close atoms (14C,16C, dis=0.8) are not identified as "overlaped" while another two atoms (11C, 16C, dis=1.8) whose distance is larger are overlaped... Is there anything wrong about understanding the overlap? Example molecular (init.mol2): @<TRIPOS>MOLECULE init.mol2 20 19 20 0 0 NUCLEIC_ACID NO_CHARGES @<TRIPOS>ATOM 1 C 14.7888 10.0072 -5.6663 C.3 1 DA 0.0000 2 C 15.4013 8.5150 -3.5012 C.3 2 DA 0.0000 3 C 13.7388 8.7698 -5.6133 C.3 3 DA 0.0000 4 C 14.6414 7.5770 -3.3654 C.3 4 DA 0.0000 5 C 12.9675 5.9273 -2.0359 C.3 5 DA 0.0000 6 C 13.6457 4.0155 -0.2544 C.3 6 DA 0.0000 7 C 12.8822 2.8588 2.0634 C.3 7 DA 0.0000 8 C 11.7541 3.3958 4.4562 C.3 8 DA 0.0000 9 C 11.2290 4.5854 6.8231 C.3 9 DA 0.0000 10 C 13.8907 4.6510 7.2730 C.3 10 DA 0.0000 11 C 15.5581 5.2490 9.3114 C.3 11 DA 0.0000 12 C 17.8150 4.7800 10.7177 C.3 12 DA 0.0000 13 C 18.0666 2.1205 10.3271 C.3 13 DA 0.0000 14 C 16.9288 4.4119 9.4640 C.3 14 DA 0.0000 15 C 14.9471 3.0788 10.7232 C.3 15 DA 0.0000 16 C 16.7345 3.9070 8.8773 C.3 16 DA 0.0000 17 C 15.5384 2.3512 10.7314 C.3 17 DA 0.0000 18 C 16.0476 1.4159 8.2501 C.3 18 DA 0.0000 19 C 17.5152 1.5369 5.9877 C.3 19 DA 0.0000 20 C 17.5650 3.1811 3.8468 C.3 20 DA 0.0000 @<TRIPOS>BOND 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 3 3 4 1 4 4 5 1 5 5 6 1 6 6 7 1 7 7 8 1 8 8 9 1 9 9 10 1 10 10 11 1 11 11 12 1 12 12 13 1 13 13 14 1 14 14 15 1 15 15 16 1 16 16 17 1 17 17 18 1 18 18 19 1 19 19 20 1 @<TRIPOS>SUBSTRUCTURE 1 DA 1 RESIDUE 4 A DA 1 ROOT 2 DA 2 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 3 DA 3 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 4 DA 4 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 5 DA 5 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 6 DA 6 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 7 DA 7 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 8 DA 8 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 9 DA 9 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 10 DA 10 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 11 DA 11 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 12 DA 12 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 13 DA 13 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 14 DA 14 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 15 DA 15 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 16 DA 16 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 17 DA 17 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 18 DA 18 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 19 DA 19 RESIDUE 4 A DA 2 20 DA 20 RESIDUE 4 A DA 1 Best Wishes! Jiying Jia
participants (2)
-
Elaine Meng -
xibei