On Nvidia or AMD graphics stick display is faster than wire as can be seen on the Chimera benchmarks web page

But as you say, Intel graphics which is typical low-end laptop graphics, has much slower stick rendering.  This is because the Intel OpenGL drivers are not providing hardware accelerated instancing that makes the sticks (and spheres) fast.  Modern graphics is making wire hard to do well — using modern OpenGL, which ChimeraX uses but not Chimera, the OpenGL standard does not support linewidths other than 1 pixel — a signicant problem on retina display where the lines become very thin. The modern solution to this is to use a small diameter cylinder.  Chimera 1 has been held back from utilizing the latest graphics features (e.g. enabling ambient occlusion lighting) by all the effort we put into supporting the low-end systems (Intel graphics).  Our emphasis in going from Chimera 1 to ChimeraX is to give use of modern graphics higher priority than supporting low-end computers.  Ideally if we had enough money we could do both.  All that said, we might add wire molecular display but it is a low priority.  You may be better off using Chimera 1 on computers not suited for 3d graphics.

Tom