Greetings, I am curious if others have found AlphaFold3 to be slightly worse or less consistent at predicting protein-protein interactions than AlphaFold2. From the AF3 paper it appeared that they were roughly equivalent, with AF3 perhaps having a slight edge. Certainly when it comes to speed and the handling of large proteins, AF3 is far superior. But over time I’ve found a number of cases where AF2 did a better job based on experimentally supported evidence from our lab. Admittedly, this observation is entirely anecdotal and likely prone to bias. And I get that AF2 may predict some interactions better than AF3 and vice versa. But it’s still makes me wonder and I was curious if others had noticed this pattern or had thoughts on the matter. Thanks in advance. David