Hi, This question isn’t specifically about chimerax, but I hope it’s in the ball park. For most of the protein pairs I’ve tested using multimer, the ipTM scores for the 5-10 models are relatively consistent. For example all 0.2–0.3, or 0.75–0.85, or 0.4–0.6. But occasionally I’ll get one or two very high scores (>0.7) with the rest being low or somewhat randomly scattered. My instinct, of course, is to put more faith in scores when the models converge. At the same time, I don’t want ignore a potentially real interaction. So, I’m wondering how people interpret ipTMs when the numbers are variable between models. What is the reason that some protein pairs show this pattern? Is the good score(s) indicative or something real or a false positive. Are the bad scores indicative of true or false negative? Any thoughts, insights, and possible follow up approaches would be greatly appreciated! David