Greg, I’m guessing this is yours…

—Eric

Begin forwarded message:

From: Eric Pettersen <pett@cgl.ucsf.edu>
Subject: Fwd: [chimerax-users] ChimeraX installation on Debian Trixie? (Unsatisfied dependencies)
Date: January 23, 2025 at 3:45:29 PM PST
To: chimerax-programmers@cgl.ucsf.edu
Cc: Elaine Meng <meng@cgl.ucsf.edu>

Anybody?

Begin forwarded message:

From: Francisco Murphy Pérez via ChimeraX-users <chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu>
Subject: [chimerax-users] ChimeraX installation on Debian Trixie? (Unsatisfied dependencies)
Date: January 19, 2025 at 1:22:00 PM PST
To: ChimeraX Users Help <chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu>
Reply-To: Francisco Murphy Pérez <francisco.murphy@ibt.unam.mx>

```
root@debian# apt install ./ucsf-chimerax_1.9ubuntu24.04_amd64.deb
Note, selecting 'ucsf-chimerax' instead of './ucsf-chimerax_1.9ubuntu24.04_amd64.deb'
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

Unsatisfied dependencies:
 ucsf-chimerax : Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 but it is not installable

root@debian# apt install ./libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0_2.42.12+dfsg-1+b1_amd64.deb
Note, selecting 'libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0' instead of './libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0_2.42.12+dfsg-1+b1_amd64.deb'
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 is already the newest version (2.42.12+dfsg-1+b1).
libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 set to manually installed.
Summary:
  Upgrading: 0, Installing: 0, Removing: 0, Not Upgrading: 0
```

From here https://github.com/RBVI/ChimeraX/blob/develop/mkubuntu.py (line 308) looks like  "libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0": "2.40.0+dfsg", is missing a dash?


_______________________________________________
ChimeraX-users mailing list -- chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu
To unsubscribe send an email to chimerax-users-leave@cgl.ucsf.edu
Archives: https://mail.cgl.ucsf.edu/mailman/archives/list/chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu/