If you run this command before running colombic, does it fix the problem? setattr :CYM r name CYS --Eric
On Oct 12, 2024, at 7:13 AM, saverio via ChimeraX-users <chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:
Hi, I have six representative frames, in pdb format , of six clusters evaluated with cpptraj of a trajectory . For three representative frames the command "coulombic protein" the surface is produced without any problem whereas for the remaining three I receive errors similar to the following text:
coulombic protein Using Amber 20 recommended default charges and atom types for standard residues Assigning partial charges to residue CYM (net charge -1) with am1-bcc method Running ANTECHAMBER command: /usr/lib/ucsf-chimerax/bin/amber20/bin/antechamber -ek qm_theory='AM1', -i /tmp/tmp76d1_frw/ante.in.mol2 -fi mol2 -o /tmp/tmp76d1_frw/ante.out.mol2 -fo mol2 -c bcc -nc -1 -j 5 -s 2 -dr n (CYM) (CYM) Welcome to antechamber 20.0: molecular input file processor. (CYM) (CYM) Info: Finished reading file (/tmp/tmp76d1_frw/ante.in.mol2); atoms read (22), bonds read (21). (CYM) Info: Determining atomic numbers from atomic symbols which are case sensitive. (CYM) Running: /usr/lib/ucsf-chimerax/bin/amber20/bin/bondtype -j part -i ANTECHAMBER_BOND_TYPE.AC0 -o ANTECHAMBER_BOND_TYPE.AC -f ac (CYM) (CYM) (CYM) Running: /usr/lib/ucsf-chimerax/bin/amber20/bin/atomtype -i ANTECHAMBER_AC.AC0 -o ANTECHAMBER_AC.AC -p gaff (CYM) Info: Total number of electrons: 94; net charge: -1 (CYM) (CYM) Running: /usr/lib/ucsf-chimerax/bin/amber20/bin/sqm -O -i sqm.in -o sqm.out (CYM) (CYM) Running: /usr/lib/ucsf-chimerax/bin/amber20/bin/am1bcc -i ANTECHAMBER_AM1BCC_PRE.AC -o ANTECHAMBER_AM1BCC.AC -f ac -p /usr/lib/ucsf-chimerax/bin/amber20/dat/antechamber/BCCPARM.DAT -s 2 -j 1 (CYM) (CYM) Running: /usr/lib/ucsf-chimerax/bin/amber20/bin/atomtype -f ac -p bcc -o ANTECHAMBER_AM1BCC.AC -i ANTECHAMBER_AM1BCC_PRE.AC (CYM) Charges for residue CYM determined Assigning partial charges to residue CYM (net charge -1) with am1-bcc method CYM: number of electrons (92) + formal charge (-1) is odd; cannot compute charges for radical species using AM1-BCC method
Any suggestions to solve this problem?
Thanks. Saverio
_______________________________________________ ChimeraX-users mailing list -- chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu To unsubscribe send an email to chimerax-users-leave@cgl.ucsf.edu Archives: https://mail.cgl.ucsf.edu/mailman/archives/list/chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu/