Greg, I’m guessing this is yours… —Eric
Begin forwarded message:
From: Eric Pettersen <pett@cgl.ucsf.edu> Subject: Fwd: [chimerax-users] ChimeraX installation on Debian Trixie? (Unsatisfied dependencies) Date: January 23, 2025 at 3:45:29 PM PST To: chimerax-programmers@cgl.ucsf.edu Cc: Elaine Meng <meng@cgl.ucsf.edu>
Anybody?
Begin forwarded message:
From: Francisco Murphy Pérez via ChimeraX-users <chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu> Subject: [chimerax-users] ChimeraX installation on Debian Trixie? (Unsatisfied dependencies) Date: January 19, 2025 at 1:22:00 PM PST To: ChimeraX Users Help <chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu> Reply-To: Francisco Murphy Pérez <francisco.murphy@ibt.unam.mx>
``` root@debian# apt install ./ucsf-chimerax_1.9ubuntu24.04_amd64.deb Note, selecting 'ucsf-chimerax' instead of './ucsf-chimerax_1.9ubuntu24.04_amd64.deb' Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Unsatisfied dependencies: ucsf-chimerax : Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 but it is not installable
root@debian# apt install ./libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0_2.42.12+dfsg-1+b1_amd64.deb Note, selecting 'libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0' instead of './libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0_2.42.12+dfsg-1+b1_amd64.deb' libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 is already the newest version (2.42.12+dfsg-1+b1). libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 set to manually installed. Summary: Upgrading: 0, Installing: 0, Removing: 0, Not Upgrading: 0 ```
From here https://github.com/RBVI/ChimeraX/blob/develop/mkubuntu.py (line 308) looks like "libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0": "2.40.0+dfsg", is missing a dash?
_______________________________________________ ChimeraX-users mailing list -- chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu To unsubscribe send an email to chimerax-users-leave@cgl.ucsf.edu Archives: https://mail.cgl.ucsf.edu/mailman/archives/list/chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu/