April 2016 - Chimera-users - RBVI Mailing Lists

Adding 3D arrows (vectors) in a scene
by Henrique C. S. Junior 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

Dear list, Magnetic Anisotropy is a directional property and, because of that, it is useful to repreent it as a vector that crosses the molecule. Is that a way to add 3D "arrows" (vectors) using Chimera? -- *Henrique C. S. Junior* Químico Industrial - UFRRJ Mestrando em Química Inorgânica - UFRRJ Centro de Processamento de Dados - PMP

2 2

B-weighted map
by Quentin Vicens 05 Apr '16

05 Apr '16

Hi folks, Would anyone know whether B-factor weighted maps can be calculated in Chimera? For example as an option to molmap or another tool. The goal would be to look at the correlation between a pdb and a map using "fit in map" but by taking B-factor info into account. Thanks! Quentin Quentin Vicens University of Strasbourg, France National Center for Scientific Research

2 1

on contact surface and domain angle
by Smith Liu 04 Apr '16

04 Apr '16

Dear All, Will you please tell me the command to calculate the contact surface area between 2 sub-units in the protein complex? Will you please also tell me the command to calculate the angle in degree between 2 domains in a subunit? Smith

2 1

ACA 2016 SAS Workshop
by Kushol Gupta 02 Apr '16

02 Apr '16

On behalf of the organizing committee, I am pleased to announce a workshop on "Computational Approaches to the Structural Modelling of Biological Macromolecules using Small Angle Scattering." This workshop will take place on Friday, July 22nd, 2016 at this year's American Crystallographic Association (ACA) Meeting in Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. The meeting itself will run from July 22-26. WK.02 Computational Approaches to the Structural Modelling of Biological Macromolecules using Small-Angle Scattering. This one-day workshop will focus on computational approaches to structural modelling and analysis. In the first session, a brief reprise of fundamental concepts will be provided, with a focus on pitfalls in data acquisition and reduction that can affect subsequent data analysis and modelling. The remainder of the day will be allocated to the hand-on application of the leading software packages to the analysis of solution scatter. This workshop will feature direct participation from the creators of the most prevalent software packages currently used (including BIOSAXS(EMBL), SIBYLS, CCP-SAS, FoXs and IMP). The participating groups will present their software, including the basis for the algorithms employed, and further deliver guided hands-on tutorials for workshop participants. This approach will introduce and train participants on the appropriate application of these tools, including experimental design, model preparation, comparison of structural models using both SAS and complementary information, validation, and most importantly the limitations of interpretation with regards to the biological conclusions that can be made. The workshop format will include lectures, and a selection of hands-on practical exercises. Students will be expected to bring laptops with appropriate pre-installed software as necessary. Prior to the workshop, a website will be made available containing installation instructions and software for each tutorial. Tentative Program Schedule Basic Theory and Methods Joint Session 8:00 am - 9:30am - Introduction: what is SAS data good for? (short) - Theory Essentials: How to get your scattering profiles - SAXS and SANS: common pitfalls, how to ensure the data is suitable for modelling - Cross Checks and Validation 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM Coffee Break Software Application and Tutorial Session 10 am - 7pm 10:00 AM - 11:30 AM BIOSAXS(EMBL) lectures and guided tutorial 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM Lunch and Discussions (vendor presentations in the form of 'lunch and learn') 12:30 PM - 2:00 PM IMP Lectures and Guided Tutorial 2:30 PM - 3:00 PM Coffee Break 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM SIBYLS lectures and guided tutorial 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM CCP-SAS lectures and guided tutorial 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM Discussion Pre-registration is mandatory. The fee to attend is: . Student (undergrad, grad or postdoctoral) - $140 . Corporate - $275 . Non corporate or non student - $140 Lunch will be included. Organizers: . Angela Criswell Rigaku Americas Corporatio Angela.Criswell(a)rigaku.com . Richard Gillilan Cornell CHESS reg8(a)cornell.edu . Kushol Gupta Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania kgupta(a)upenn.edu . Michal Hammel SIBYLS group at The Advanced Light Source (ALS) mhammel(a)lbl.gov . Susan Krueger NIST Center for Neutron Research/CCP-SAS susan.krueger(a)nist.gov . Maxim Petoukhov BIOSAXS group at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) maxim.petoukhov(a)embl-hamburg.de . Adam Round EMBL Grenoble around(a)embl.fr . Dina Schneidman Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem dina.schneidman(a)mail.huji.ac.il . Jill Trewhella University of Sydney jill.trewhella(a)sydney.edu.au More information is available at: http://www.amercrystalassn.org/wk.02-saxs http://www.amercrystalassn.org/2016-meeting-homepage Kushol Gupta, Ph.D. Research Assistant Professor Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania <mailto:kgupta@upenn.edu> kgupta(a)upenn.edu / 215.573.7260 / 267.259.0082 / <http://www.stwing.upenn.edu/~kgupta> www.stwing.upenn.edu/~kgupta

1 1

mcopy for maps?
by Oliver Clarke 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hi all, is there an equivalent command to mcopy for maps? I find mcopy really handy for copying display settings from one molecule to another, would be great to have a similar facility for maps - maybe it already exists and I can't find it? Cheers, Oli

2 1

buriedArea calculation: MSMS vs Chimera
by Bala subramanian 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Friends, I have a task to calculate how much is the buried SASA during formation of a bi-domain protein. The usual relation to obtain is (SAS-domain1 + SAS-domain2) - SAS-complete I have a difficulty to understand how the calculation is performed in Chimera. As a test case, i used the 1crn.pdb and performed using MSMS and in Chimera. *MSMS calculation* (Input: msms -if 1crn.xyzr -probe_radius 1.5 -density 3.0) Complete system SAS = 3054.258 , (residue 1-23) pA = 2143.122 , (residue 24-46) pB = 2324.809, hence total buried = ( pA + pB) - 3054.258 = 1413.673 *Chimer calculation* surf #0 (Reply log: SAS = 3022.61) measure buriedArea :1-23 :24-46 probeRadius 1.5 vertexDensity 3.0 Status line : SAS = 697.876, SES = 423.938 Reply log: *Buried solvent accessible surface area* B1SAS = 681.191, B2SAS = 714.56, BaveSAS = 697.876 (A1 = 2116.11, A2 = 2302.43, A12 = 3022.79 = 1434.92 + 1587.86) I am not getting the calculation (and the motive as well) of the BaveSAS in the following part of the code. q1) What is Chimera actually doing here q2) Which one i should report, raw buried SAS or BaveSAS in your opinion ? ---------------------------------- for ai,a in enumerate(atoms1): a.buriedSESArea = aareas1[ai,0] - aareas12[ai,0] a.buriedSASArea = aareas1[ai,1] - aareas12[ai,1] ases121 += aareas12[ai,0] asas121 += aareas12[ai,1] for ai,a in enumerate(atoms2): a.buriedSESArea = aareas2[ai,0] - aareas12[n1+ai,0] a.buriedSASArea = aareas2[ai,1] - aareas12[n1+ai,1] ases122 += aareas12[n1+ai,0] asas122 += aareas12[n1+ai,1] careas1, careas2, careas12 = s1[4], s2[4], s12[4] ases1, asas1 = area_sums(careas1) ases2, asas2 = area_sums(careas2) ases12, asas12 = area_sums(careas12) bsas1 = asas1 - asas121 bsas2 = asas2 - asas122 bsas = 0.5 * (bsas1 + bsas2) bses1 = ases1 - ases121 bses2 = ases2 - ases122 bses = 0.5 * (bses1 + bses2) Thanks, Bala -- C. Balasubramanian -- C. Balasubramanian

2 1

how to fit the em density map of crystal
by Yaowang Li 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Dear all, I am thinking about how to fit the EM density map of crystal. cryo-EM images of crystal were collected and reconstructed to a map, but with a poor resolution(around 7A). In this condition, which is the best way to fit the map? Best Regards, Yaowang LIC, Leiden University

2 3