- Chimera-users - RBVI Mailing Lists

Error with partial charge calculation during minimisation
by Ahir Pushpanath 13 Aug '14

13 Aug '14

Hey there, whenever I try to do a minimisation of a ligand in presence of protein, with a few residues selected as flexible , rest held as rigid, I get past the adding hydrogen box, but it always has a error saying it cant calculate partial charge for the first N-terminal residue, N atom , for example. If I try and delete that residue, it just moves up and says it cant do it for the second one. The PDB file seems fine, and I have opened in Discovery studio and seen it has partial charges assigned fine. Can you enlighten me on what maybe going wrong? I am using the latest build of Chimera. PDB is 1BW9 chain A (only one conformation chosen in multiple conformation residue positions). The ligand is the PPY inside. the flexible residues are all those 5A away apart from NAD. -- Dr. Ahir Pushpanath* PhD.* Senior Biologist, Johnson Matthey.

2 1

Surface color by electrostatic potential
by roz orchidea 13 Aug '14

13 Aug '14

Dear all, I am trying to get some images of the electrostatic potential surface of my complex. But I have noticed that by using the same .dx file in chimera and vmd, I am getting different coloring results. Chimera gives more negatively charged areas. I used the -5 0 5 coloring for both. Is it a difference in reading the .dx files between the 2 software? I also think that Chimera colors each side chain by the avg charge. Is it possible to have a more detailed coloring of the surface according the charges? Thanks in advance, Alexandra

2 1

Re: [Chimera-users] [chimera-dev] Feature request
by Elaine Meng 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

Dear Xavier, I personally don’t recommend the Chimera/Povray approach… my neon/conic suggestion is better-looking, but not as easy as the feature you request. There is limited programmer time, so I can’t say it will happen, but we can put it on the list of requests. You can enable showing backbone atoms at the same time as ribbon with command “ribbackbone” — then try displaying the carbonyls. You may also need to unchain (avoid drawing long bonds between different carbonyls, e.g. command: setattr m autochain 0). However, the default ribbon path is smoothed, so in some places the backbone atoms will appear to be floating away from the ribbon. You can try reducing that problem by using a different method to calculate the ribbon path, for example, with command: ribspline cardinal smooth strand …but see the manual for other command options and parameters. The cardinal spline tries to follow CA positions, so it is still possible you won’t be able to totally eliminate spaces between ribbon and C atoms. It may be necessary to show the C atoms as balls (slightly larger than stick-ends) to obscure the gapping. The ribbackbone and ribbon path issues are discussed in more detail here: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera/docs/ContributedSoftware/ribbonstyle/ribbo…> I hope this helps, Elaine On Aug 11, 2014, at 1:48 AM, F.Xavier Gomis-Rüth <xgrcri(a)ibmb.csic.es> wrote: > Dear Elaine & Eric, > thanks again for your and Eric's suggestions. The issue is that the POV-Ray rendering is not as attractive as the CHIMERA rendering. > Would it be possible to kindly and humbly request that this minor feature be implemented at a certain time point in a new version > of the program :-) ? > Another issue I have currently problems with: > it would be very helpful to be able to display the main-chain carbonyls sticking out from the ribbon at the right place. I tried with the > licorize option of the ribbon trace but it was not solving the problem. This is particularly helpful when representing e.g. metal-binding sites. > Thanks again for your help and dedication to constantly improve this fantastic program. > Best wishes, > Xavier > > On 1/8/14 9:11 PM, Elaine Meng wrote: >> A few caveats of the Povray approach: >> In my tests (current daily build), it always makes cylinders with the same aspect ratio regardless of whether I am showing the lines as dotted or dashed in Chimera. Also, it is hard to tell they are cylinders unless you make the linewidth fairly large. >> >> Elaine >> >> On Aug 1, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Eric Pettersen >> <pett(a)cgl.ucsf.edu> >> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Xavier, >>> In addition to Elaine's neon suggestion, if when you save an image you change the rendering from "Chimera" to "POV-Ray" then any dashed or dotted lines will be converted into equivalent cylinders and spheres in the POV-Ray image. I've attached an image that shows how a distance looks. >>> >>> --Eric >>> >>> > > -- > <fxgr_signanew.jpg>

2 2

huge electrostatic range for APBS
by Dennis N Bromley 07 Aug '14

07 Aug '14

Hi all, I have two proteins models from different points in an MD simulation. I colored the surface by Coulombic Surface Coloring, which ran AnteChamber and such. Then I ran APBS. When I color by the APBS data, they look more or less similar. But when I click the "Set full range" button, the kBTe unit range on one is about +-3 and the unit range on the other is about +-300. Any ideas why one would be so much larger? Or am I misinterpreting something? Both were run with exactly the same parameters, all default except for temperature = 310. thanks- -denny-

3 3

"match" command with serialNumber specifier
by Hiroyuki ISOBE 06 Aug '14

06 Aug '14

Dear Sir: I would like to run “match” with two models by using serialNumber specifiers but fail to specify multiple atoms. I would like to match the following sets of atoms: SerialNumber=14,31,91,74 for model #0 and SerialNumber=74,91,31,14 for model #1 How should I include multiple atoms in the command line? The command for one atom, match #1/serialNumber=14 #0/serialNumber=74 works nicely, but I cannot include, for instance, two atoms with match #1/serialNumber=14,31 #0/serialNumber=74,91 or match #1/serialNumber=14 31 #0/serialNumber=74 91 Could you please let me know the correct commands for this purpose? Thank you for your kind help in advance. Sincerely, Hiroyuki -- Hiroyuki ISOBE Advanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI-AIMR) Department of Chemistry Tohoku University Sendai, 980-8578, Japan Tel: +81-(0)22-795-6585 Fax: +81-(0)22-795-6589 Email: isobe(a)m.tohoku.ac.jp Homepage: http://www.orgchem2.chem.tohoku.ac.jp

2 2

cannot save a Chimera session
by ouyang 06 Aug '14

06 Aug '14

Dear All, I use Chimera1.9 in WindowsXP. I failed to save Chimera session neither by using the 'save' command nor 'file/save session (or save session as)' menu. Somehow, the file menu choice 'save session' is always displayed in gray and not clickable. Could anyone know what problem it would be and how to fix it? Thanks a lot! Best. Ouyang

2 1

Delphi electrostatic potential visualization
by Joshua Broyde 04 Aug '14

04 Aug '14

Hi, My name is Joshua Broyde, and I am a big fan of Chimera. I have recently been using Chimera to visualize Delphi outputs (i.e. .phi files).As per your advice here: http://plato.cgl.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimera-users/2006-March/000710.html I have been using Delphi itself and visualizing the output in Chimera, rather than using the DelphiController within Chimera. Chimera seems to not consistently be able to visualize the output of Delphi on the surface of the proteins. After coloring 2 different protein models with the delphi electrostatic output, I tried to color the third protein surface I was examining with the Delphi output, and Chimera simply colored it gray. To double check that this was not a Delphi problem, I then took this protein structure and created a separate chimera session with it, and then Chimera was able to visualize the Delphi output on the protein surface. Is this a bug or something? Is there a way around this? I want to be able to visualize many Delphi outputs at once on Chimera. Thanks so much, you guys are great! Sincerely, Joshua Broyde

3 3

Chimera script specify filetype
by Thomas Hrabe 02 Aug '14

02 Aug '14

Hi everyone, I have a donwload option on our page for chimera python scripts - one example is attached. When you open it, chimera asks for the filetype. How can I hardocde it’s a PDB file? Thanks, Thomas

3 3

Setup for 3D workstations?
by Kenward Vaughan 30 Jul '14

30 Jul '14

Hello all, I apologize if this is skewed for the list; please correct me if so. I am putting together a proposal to set up a 3D/computational lab at our school for the STEM area, with Chimera at the top of the list of applications using it. The general idea is to have 10 workstations and one workstation-server (the server side being used for computational work), with students at each station doing their own things. Does anyone have an idea of the best setup for each station with respect to hardware for viewing in 3D?? I expect our Dell-camp school to go with something like an Inspiron T5610, using an nVidia K4000 card. I was thinking that the nVidia 3D vision system made sense, but honestly don't know if that would work with 10 different ones going at once. I am unfamiliar with other options. Would someone help me with this? There would be two or three students at each station, FWIW. Am I out in left field in my thinking? Cheers, Kenward -- In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be *teachers* and the rest of us would have to settle for something less, because passing civilization along from one generation to the next ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone could have. - Lee Iacocca

3 7

About MD movie problem
by rama david 30 Jul '14

30 Jul '14

Dear Friends, I completed the simulation of peptide ligand and receptor in gromacs. I want to make the simulation movie. I am using latest version of chimera. I also converted the trajectory files into single pdb movie in gromacs. I did following process: 1. Through tool----> Md movie-- I choose the gromacs option and load the tpr and trr/xtc files. But the software shows that the memory is not enough. ( Frame 4000 and atoms 8000) 2. For second time I chose the PDB option for Mdvie. I load the PDB & now I am getting following message : Residue 4.C not in the first model on line 17718 of Md.pdb file. I am pasting the few lines of md.pdb starting from line 17718 ATOM 8852 N NH2 C 4 61.241 96.447 51.027 1.00 0.00 ATOM 8853 H1 NH2 C 4 61.539 97.208 50.457 1.00 0.00 ATOM 8854 H2 NH2 C 4 61.923 95.899 51.517 1.00 0.00 END Could you please help me in the above problem, I will be a very thankful to you for your help. This is very Important movie for my work. I am looking for reply, With best Wishes Rama David

2 1