- Chimera-users - RBVI Mailing Lists

Re: [Chimera-users] suppressing warning messages
by Eric Pettersen 08 Jan '08

08 Jan '08

Hi Ryan, Perhaps other Chimera developers can chime in, but I don't know of any good way to selectively suppress the non-status messages that Chimera generates, particularly the "duplicate atom serial number" messages which are being put on standard error by code in the C++ layer. What I can suggest in your situation is that you have your print statements go to standard error (so that they flush through pipes immediately) and that you prefix them with some unique string that you can grep for. Something like: from sys import __stderr__ as stderr print>>stderr, "OUTPUT", "my result:", r and run Chimera with: chimera --nogui myscript.py |& grep OUTPUT --Eric On Jan 8, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Ryan Pavlovicz wrote: > Are there ways just to suppress the chimera output? I'd still like > to see some of my print commands that are part of my python script, > so i can easily debug, follow a process, etc.? > > On Jan 8, 2008 1:24 PM, Eric Pettersen < pett(a)cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote: > Well to suppress all output you would use normal shell redirection > to /dev/null. For csh-style shells, something like this: > > chimera --nogui >& /dev/null > > --Eric > > Eric Pettersen > UCSF Computer Graphics Lab > http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu > > > On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Ryan wrote: > >> The --nostatus option will suppress messages like: >> >> "Executing xxx.py... Opening xxx.pdb..." >> >> but still, messages like: >> >> "Model 0 (xxx.pdb) appears to be a protein with noe secondary >> structure assignements. Computing assignments..." & "warning: >> duplicate atom serial number found..." >> >> are still printed to the screen. Are there ways to suppress these >> messages as well? Thanks again, >> >> ryan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Chimera-users mailing list >> Chimera-users(a)cgl.ucsf.edu >> http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/chimera-users > >

1 0

Re: [Chimera-users] suppressing warning messages
by Ryan 08 Jan '08

08 Jan '08

The --nostatus option will suppress messages like: "Executing xxx.py... Opening xxx.pdb..." but still, messages like: "Model 0 (xxx.pdb) appears to be a protein with noe secondary structure assignements. Computing assignments..." & "warning: duplicate atom serial number found..." are still printed to the screen. Are there ways to suppress these messages as well? Thanks again, ryan

2 1

suppressing warning messages
by Ryan 08 Jan '08

08 Jan '08

Is there a way to suppress warning messages when using Chimera in a python script (--nogui option)? Additionally, is there a way to suppress the additional non-warning Chimera output that prints to screen when running via python script? Thanks, ryan

2 1

How to input more than one mdcrd file
by Francesco Pietra 07 Jan '08

07 Jan '08

I was unable to input more that one mdcrd file to MD Movie (to get a single pdb file for EnsembleCluster). I tried by either giving the files one to one, or with the following prod.meta: amber my.prmtop prod1.mdcrd.gz prod2.mdcrd.gz prod3.mdcrd.gz Always, I got prod1 trajectories alone. I used compressed coordinate files also when fed one to one. I did not try with non compressed files. Thanks francesco pietra ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

2 1

chimera crashes my linux 64 bits PC
by jean-francois menetret 07 Jan '08

07 Jan '08

After I rebooted my linux 64 bits PC this morning, chimera crashes the machine. I tried older versions of chimera ... same result :-( How can I fix that situation ? Jean-Fran�ois M�n�tret, PhD Boston University School of Medicine Physiology and Biophysics Department 700 Albany Street W315 Boston, MA 02118 Email: menetret(a)bu.edu Mailing address: 715 Albany Street

2 1

mean structure
by sette＠uniroma2.it 07 Jan '08

07 Jan '08

Hi, I don't know if someone already ask for this... It is possible to calculate an average structure having a bundle of structures? I loaded from the pdb a file containing 30 NMR structures but I would like to use only the mean structure... Thanks for your help, Marco Dr.Marco Sette, Ph.D. Department of Chemical Sciences and Technology University of Rome, "Tor Vergata" via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133, Rome, Italy e-mail: sette(a)uniroma2.it Tel.: +39-0672594424 Fax: +39-0672594328

2 1

Slow dealing with pdb files
by Francesco Pietra 03 Jan '08

03 Jan '08

I am dealing with the average structure (a protein complex embedded in a POCP membrane and water solvated) derived with Amber's ptraj from a 1.5 ns MD. Opening this pdb file in 1.2470 Chimera has become extremely slow. The file is 6.4MB. First, below the screen it is warned "Ignored bad PDB record found on line #", for lines from 1 to 114154. This may take some 10 minutes. The pdb records read as in the following examples: For the lipid: ATOM 20 2C21 POP 1 25.569 20.201 48.492 0.00 0.00 For the protein: ATOM 10915 HB2 ALA 117 44.211 74.567 28.832 0.00 0.00 For water: ATOM 22264 O WAT 1771 25.558 39.417 16.580 0.00 0.00 ATOM 22265 H1 WAT 1771 25.582 39.432 16.549 0.00 0.00 ATOM 22266 H2 WAT 1771 25.569 39.482 16.611 0.00 0.00 After that, the warning message changes to "Computed secondary structure assignments (see reply log)" which lasts for longer than 1 hour and 20 minutes. During this time, "top" command shows that python is using 12% MEM and 99% CPU. Then, the graphics appears, with the membrane-protein-complex not centered in the water box. During all that time, I had to avoid doing anything else with the GNOME interface. A second terminal for "top" had to be opened before launching Chimera on another terminal window. Otherwise, spurious graphics become superimposed to the Chimera window. I could then carry out rapid mapping of the protein residues around the single-residue ligand (select protein & :ligandname z<#), which was what I wanted to do. The same events occurred with shorter trajectories. At ca 0.7ns the time taken by Chimera to work out the average-structure pdb was about 15 minutes. Clearly, there is an exponential trend. I can in part compare these events on VMD: the pdb file from 1.5ns MD is opened in VMD in less than 1 minute and the resulting membrane-protein-complex is centered in the water box. Is all that caused by the not-updated atom naming by Amber? Or could the execution be accelerated by calling some C routines by python? Chimera was run on a modest desktop: Athlon 1GHz, RAM 1GB, a poor main board (product: K7S5A, vendor: ECS, version: 1.0), Debian Linux i386. Thanks francesco pietra ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

2 4

Fwd: Re: Slow dealing with pdb files
by Francesco Pietra 03 Jan '08

03 Jan '08

Must add that alternatively to "average structure" I tried a cluster analysis with MMTSB. The program refused to work on my trajectories for unclear reasons: the program is installed correctly and the input is correct (as verified by the program author). Therefore, I am eagerly waiting for Chimera being able to carry out cluster analysis (if I understood correctly your message to this regards) francesco --- Francesco Pietra <chiendarret(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:04:40 -0800 (PST) > From: Francesco Pietra <chiendarret(a)yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [Chimera-users] Slow dealing with pdb files > To: Eric Pettersen <pett(a)cgl.ucsf.edu> > CC: chimera <chimera-users(a)cgl.ucsf.edu> > > Eric: > Thanks a lot for this lesson, surely useful to many other guys, too. > > Whether looking at an "average structure" or some other output structure was > a > problem I got no clarification from the Amber mailing list. Unfortunately, Pr > Brozell is not active in this period on Dockfans to ask him. My question was, > is the "average structure" representative of the interactions occurring > between > the protein and the ligand as resulting from the MD carried out? Although > DOCK6.1 does that with amber score, it is only for implicit medium > surrounding > the complex. Ideally, I would have liked to estimate the free energy of > interaction in the presence of explicit surrounding medium but Amber does not > appear to have a way to that for a complex in a membrane (or anyway for a > non-standard ligand). Therefore, what I am relying on, is the distance > between > the protein residues and the ligand. The closest the protein residues are to > the ligand, the more they are considered to be relevant. > > At any event, given the problem Chimera has encountered with an average > structure, do you believe that mapping the protein environment around the > ligand with Chimera's "zone" is correct? From your "lesson" I understand YES. > > I would appreciate any comment or suggestion about that. > > francesco > > --- Eric Pettersen <pett(a)cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote: > > > On Jan 1, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Francesco Pietra wrote: > > > > > I am dealing with the average structure (a protein complex embedded > > > in a POCP > > > membrane and water solvated) derived with Amber's ptraj from a 1.5 > > > ns MD. > > > > > > Opening this pdb file in 1.2470 Chimera has become extremely slow. > > > The file is > > > 6.4MB. First, below the screen it is warned "Ignored bad PDB record > > > found on > > > line #", for lines from 1 to 114154. This may take some 10 minutes. > > > > These are for the water ATOM records where the atom serial number and/ > > or residue number were "****" (what FORTRAN inserts when a number > > won't fit inside a field width). > > > > > After that, the warning message changes to "Computed secondary > > > structure > > > assignments (see reply log)" which lasts for longer than 1 hour and > > > 20 minutes. > > > During this time, "top" command shows that python is using 12% MEM > > > and 99% CPU. > > > > Due to the fact that this is an "average" structure, Chimera's > > estimation of the connectivity is bad for many parts of the structure > > -- particularly the POP residues in the membrane. This creates a > > rat's nest of intra-residue connectivity which the ring-finding > > algorithm (designed for "reasonable" structures) takes a long time to > > operate on. Normally Chimera wouldn't run ring-finding as a > > structure opens, but due some interesting naming of hydrogens in the > > POP residues (e.g. RH16) it assigns some of the hydrogens to be other > > elements (e.g. rhodium, as per PDB atom naming rules). Since rhodium > > is a metal, it wants to depict it as a sphere, which means it needs > > to know the radius, which in turn depends on the atom type, which > > needs to find rings... > > > > > Then, the graphics appears, with the membrane-protein-complex not > > > centered in > > > the water box. > > > > This is due to the "****" waters being ignored. > > > > > I could then carry out rapid mapping of the protein residues around > > > the > > > single-residue ligand (select protein & :ligandname z<#), which was > > > what I > > > wanted to do. > > > > If you only care about the protein and ligand in your analysis, you > > should just edit your file to strip the waters and lipids. When I > > did this with the file you sent it only took moments to open. > > > > --Eric > > > > Eric Pettersen > > UCSF Computer Graphics Lab > > http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

2 2

selection
by Sara Bowen 03 Jan '08

03 Jan '08

Hi, I've been going through the chimera tutorial, but I'm having some trouble selecting anything. I can select atoms, and the bottom corner of the window lists what I've selected, but there is no green highlighting in the image. Then if I try to move anything, the image will move in the side view but not in the main window. It seems frozen. If I select everything or select nothing, I can still only get the image to move in the side view...not the main window. Then if I make the main window full screen, the image is just fuzzy colors like snow on a out of tune t.v. Does anybody know what's going on and how I can fix it? Thanks, Sara B. at ASU

4 3

coloring protein structure according to Order parameters
by rama krishna 03 Jan '08

03 Jan '08

Dear Friends, I need to Paint a protein structure according to generalized parameter values. Is there any way to do that in UCSF-Chimera. Kindly suggest me. Regards Ramakrishna, Dr Ashish Arora Lab, Molecular and Structural Biology lab, Central Drug Reseach Institute, India

2 1

Opening compressed trajectories
by Francesco Pietra 02 Jan '08

02 Jan '08

I found comfortable to deal with mdcrd compressed (gz) files directly in Amber's ptraj. This saves much disk space. I wonder whether this could be made available for Chimera. The scope would be twofold: other that saving disk space, shorted times of ssh transfer from the computing machine to the desktop with Chimera. Happy 2008! francesco pietra ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

2 1

saving complex structure
by bala 02 Jan '08

02 Jan '08

Dear chimera friends, I have a protein-RNA complex pdb structure. I want to remove the RNA in the crystal structure and put my RNA molecule in to the binding site. Since my RNA is very big around 20bp long, i prefer to manually dock my RNA followed by a big simulation than a automated docking. I tried in chimera and i saved the complex structure with the option "save the displayed atoms". But when i see the pdb structure, it has the coordinates of RNA molecule but not the protein. Also when i open the pdb in chimera, it shows me the protein structure. Kindly write me your comments on using chimera i) for such a manual docking and also ii) how to save the complex structure. Wish you all a happy new year, Bala

2 1

Command for volume and area calculation
by shengzhiya＠nibs.ac.cn 27 Dec '07

27 Dec '07

Dear all, May I know if there is some command in chimera for measuring volume and area like in the menus: “Tools…Surface/Binding Analysis…Measure Volume and Area”? Thanks in advance! Happy new year and have a nice holiday! Zhiya

2 2

formal charge or net charge
by snoze pa 25 Dec '07

25 Dec '07

Dear Chimera Users, Is it possible to calculate the net charge or formal charge of unknown residues using chimera. I have a large set of molecules for which i am trying to calculate the net charge on each molecule. Thanks in advance s

2 1

rmsd cluster analysis
by Elaine Meng 24 Dec '07

24 Dec '07

Hi Francesco and others, People with MD trajectories can also use this new EnsembleCluster tool (available in the most recent daily builds) by: - viewing the whole trajectory with the "MD Movie" tool, or at least all the frames you want to cluster - from the MD Movie dialog menu, choosing File... Save PDB and saving "all frames" to a file - quitting from MD Movie and opening the new file with File... Open - choosing Tools... MD/Ensemble Analysis... EnsembleCluster, clicking the line that shows that new file, then OK I just tried this to make sure it works. The clustering calculation may take a while, but eventually another dialog with results should appear. This tool is still under development and may change, but this will at least allow users to try it on trajectory ensembles as well as NMR ensembles. Best, Elaine ----- Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. meng(a)cgl.ucsf.edu UCSF Computer Graphics Lab and Babbitt Lab Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of California, San Francisco http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/meng/index.html

2 4

Transparent background
by Abbas 20 Dec '07

20 Dec '07

Hi, One feature I really appreciated about chimera was the ability to make pictures without a background, however recently i realized this is not possible anymore I checked out under the effects dialog under tools>viewing controls and it give me an error saying this wasn't supported. I haven't changed my computer since i first started using chimera I have updated to the latest version of chimera available for OSX 10.4, I wonder if this is the cause of the problem. I would really like to have pictures without backgrounds like I used to, I know PyMol lets you do it, but I dislike this program. In any case I would greatly appreciate any help/pointers on this issue. Thanks in advance. abbas.

4 4

Re: [Chimera-users] fitting models into maps
by Tom Goddard 20 Dec '07

20 Dec '07

Hi Dan, The Chimera fit model in map tool doesn't give a correlation value. To get a correlation requires you have two maps to compare, so first a map needs to be calculated from the PDB model that matches the resolution of the experimental map. Although I'd like to have that in Chimera, it is not currently there. I have used the EMAN pdb2mrc program to compute the map. Then you can use the Chimera fit map in map tool to get a correlation value, or you could use fit model in map, then open the map calculated for the PDB and find the correlation for the orientation obtained for the PDB model. You're right that reported correlation values depend on some often unreported parameters. First there is the method used for producing a map from the PDB model. Then the correlation depends on the part of the volume used. I would guess this is typically the portion within a certain contour level of the PDB map. What contour level? Something like 1 standard deviation is not sensible since it depends on the size of the map (the extent of padding). Probably a contour level that encloses a given volume -- maybe the volume enclosed by the solvent excluded surface of the PDB model with a reasonable probe radius. Would be nice if Chimera automated this calculation starting from the fit model in map position -- some day, hopefully in 2008. Reporting average density value at the atom positions would only make sense if the map is normalized. Maybe reporting that value in standard deviations. But the standard deviation depends on how much empty volume surrounds the structure, so that is not very satisfactory. Chimera reports that number so you can compare different fits in the same map -- only relative values are meaningful. Another value I have seen reported is the number of atoms outside a certain contour level of the experimental map. The fit model in map tool reports that in the reply log (Favorites / Reply Log). Of course it depends on how you set the contour level. Again if you set that as some number of standard deviations that depends on the map size. Alternatively you could set the contour level so the experimental map encloses the expected volume. Menu entry Tools / Volume Data / Measure Volume and Area can help set such a contour level. Seems correlation is the most meaningful number. You can calculate the standard deviation of a map from its mean in newer versions of Chimera with menu entry Tools / Volume Data / Volume Mean, SD, RMS. Tom Daniel Southworth wrote: > Tom: > > Hi. I'm a post-doc in David Agard's lab and I have a question about > the "fit model in map" function in chimera. I'm having some good > success fitting crystal structures into my low-resolution em maps > using this function once I get a global fit either by hand or using > situs. I'm wondering if there is any way to get a correlation value > out of the fits or how people typically report on their confidence of > the chimera fitting in publications? I know correlation values are > often different from program to program so perhaps the best measure is > to state the average map value? Any help would be great - thanks. > > Dan

2 1

superimpose --matchmaker.
by Vinay Kumar 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

Hi all, There have been a few posts previously regarding superimposing of molecules. using matchmaker would work for a pdb file. I was curious if small molecules (ligands) could be matched. I did check out the documentation and the command match. But what i am not sure abt is, in wht format should the input file for a small molecule be?? could someone suggest!! regards, Vinay

2 1

Question regarding multiple mutant in the same chimera session
by Jean-Didier Maréchal 18 Dec '07

18 Dec '07

Hi, Is there a way to copy, in the same instance of chimera, a model X time? I'd like to generate different mutant of the same prot and have them stocked in the same session of chimera. Cheers, JD -- Dr. Jean-Didier Maréchal Assistant Professor Computational Bioorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry @Transmet Unitat de Química Física Departament de Química Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 08193 Bellaterra, Spain Tel: +34.(0)1935814936 Fax: +34.(0)1935812920 e-mail:jeandidier.marechal@uab.es

2 3

rmsd cluster analysis
by Francesco Pietra 18 Dec '07

18 Dec '07

Is it feasible to command a cluster analysis from rmsd? I would like to group for likeliness snapshots from MD with respect to, say, the structure from which MD was started. Thanks francesco pietra ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

3 3

Problem with Chimera under Windows XP
by Peter Girard 18 Dec '07

18 Dec '07

I am running release 2304 of Chimera under Windows XP with service pack 2 on a Dell Inspiron 9300 laptop. The image disappears from the screen for no apparent reason. With the structures I am currently working on, this has become frequent and often occurs after just a few seconds when I click anywhere in the Chimera window. I have found that if I use Model Panel, I can get the picture back by clicking the 'Shown' box to remove the tick mark, then clicking it again to re-insert the tick. But the picture soon disappears again. Occasionally, it doesn't disappear completely, but part of it collapses, or spurious long lines appear. I had the same problem with a previous release, 2184, and was disappointed that upgrading didn't fix it. I can find no mention of anything similar in the documentation or email archive. Can anyone suggest a possible cause? Peter Girard (University of Nottingham, UK)

4 4

Regarding getSequence
by Jean-Didier Maréchal 18 Dec '07

18 Dec '07

Hi again, I'd like to return the sequence of the protein I opened in chimera in the python shell. >From what I read through, I thought that chimera.getSequence could be used to do so. I was thinking in a simple script beginning with : import chimera s=chimera.getSequence(0,0) .. However the chimera.getSequence(0,0) comes back with: Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#50>", line 1, in ? chimera.getSequence(0, 0) File "CHIMERA/share/chimera/Sequence.py", line 614, in getSequence File "CHIMERA/share/chimera/Sequence.py", line 656, in getSequences AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'residues' and chimera.getSequence(0,A) with Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#48>", line 1, in ? chimera.getSequence(0,A) NameError: name 'A' is not defined Did I understand correctly the role of getSequence? if yes, what would be the correct syntax please? Thanks a lot! All the best, JD -- Dr. Jean-Didier Maréchal Assistant Professor Computational Bioorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry @Transmet Unitat de Química Física Departament de Química Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 08193 Bellaterra, Spain Tel: +34.(0)1935814936 Fax: +34.(0)1935812920 e-mail:jeandidier.marechal@uab.es

2 1

Re: [Chimera-users] Chimera-users Digest, Vol 56, Issue 14
by Jonathan Hilmer 17 Dec '07

17 Dec '07

Ryan, Try this as a way to figure out what you can do with an object: dir(chimera.selection.currentResidues()[0]) In the above command I've indexed the list of selections to return just one object, and the dir() function will return a list of names defined by the currentResidues module. It should contain something like the following: ... 'addAtom', 'atomNames', 'atoms', 'atomsMap', 'bondedTo', 'count', 'findAtom', 'findRangeAtoms', 'getDefaultRibbonStyle', 'hasRibbon', 'id', 'isHelix', 'isHet', 'isSheet', 'isStrand', 'isTurn', 'kdHydrophobicity', 'label', 'labelColor', 'labelOffset', 'molecule', 'numAtoms', 'oslChildren', 'oslIdent', 'oslLevel', 'oslParents', 'oslTestAbbr', 'removeAtom', 'ribbonBinormals', 'ribbonCenters', 'ribbonColor', 'ribbonData', 'ribbonDisplay', 'ribbonDrawMode', 'ribbonFindStyle', 'ribbonFindStyleType', 'ribbonFindXSection', 'ribbonNormals', 'ribbonResidueClass', 'ribbonStyle', 'ribbonXSection', 'selLevel', 'type' If you try: chimera.selection.currentResidues()[0].type it will return a string with the 3-letter aa code, and the other options displayed by dir() will output useful things such as more strings, lists, or other objects that can be likewise explored. Try this combination: mySel = chimera.selection.currentResidues()[0] print "%s, %s" % (mySel.oslIdent(), mySel.type) On my test structure it returns '#0:127.A, ARG'. The second line is equivalent to 'print str(mySel.oslIdent() + ", " + mySel.type)', but the formatting I used in the above example helps to keep things clean if you have a complicated output that needs to have a specific format. There are some more advanced features of that approach detailed here: http://www.python.org/doc/1.5/tut/node45.html Jonathan > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:55:39 -0500 > From: Ryan <pavlovicz.7(a)osu.edu> > Subject: Re: [Chimera-users] printing "zone" search > To: chimera-users(a)cgl.ucsf.edu > Message-ID: <17bf4817f850.17f85017bf48(a)osu.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi Eric, thanks for your help. I'm getting closer to achieving the results i'd like. > > So i've been able to properly select the residues within a specified radius of my ligand, but am a little confused as to how Chimera handles the selection list. If i try: > > print chimera.selection.currentResidues() > > i get a list like this: > > > [<_chimera.Residue object at 0x578d2020>, <_chimera.Residue object at 0x578cbfb0>, ... ] > > but if i try: > > for x in chimera.selection.currentResidues(): > print x > > i get output that is much closer to what i'm looking for: > > > #0:499 > > #0:496 > > ... > > What is the reason for the difference between these two forms of output that seem to be accessing the same list? Also, is there a way i can get more detailed output with residue names and numbers, such as ['#0:TYR499','#0:TRP496',...]? > > Sorry if these questions are answered elsewhere, but i could not find the answers online. Is there a document out there that can teach me how to better master the Chimera Python modules for scripting? I'm no Python expert -- i've so far only been learning things as i need them. Thanks again, > > ryan

1 0

Re: [Chimera-users] other/5067 (error adding hydrogens)
by Eric Pettersen 17 Dec '07

17 Dec '07

Hi Jean-Francois, I have seen this error reported, but only very rarely (maybe once a year at most). Is there any chance you can tell me how to reproduce it? --Eric Eric Pettersen UCSF Computer Graphics Lab http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu

1 0

setting pdb path for local mirror
by Moo Cow 17 Dec '07

17 Dec '07

Sorry for an easy question. Chimera has a hook to use a local mirror of the PDB (preferences-PDB) I am too thick to see what path to give it. If you have the PDB, you have the top level /blah/blah/pdb the structure directory /blah/blah/pdb/data/structures/all and the divided directory /blah/blah/pdb/data/structures/divided/pdb When a non-python reader looks at the code (__init__.py), it seems to be trying out the divided directory IDcode = IDcode.lower() subpath = IDcode[1:3] + os.sep + "pdb" + IDcode + ".ent" pdbDir = systemPDBdir() if pdbDir is not None: ..... but this does not look correct. The PDB divided path would want subpath IDcode[1:2] to get the subdirectory "pt" from a file like "5pti" Many thanks and sorry for a seemingly daft question. -- Got No Time? Shop Online for Great Gift Ideas! http://mail.shopping.com/?linkin_id=8033174

3 2