- Chimera-users - RBVI Mailing Lists

Error while doing docking
by Reshu Kunche 27 Jul '20

27 Jul '20

2 1

HOW TO USE YOUR SOFTWARE
by HEWARTH ALBERTO MERCADO LOPEZ 25 Jul '20

25 Jul '20

HAVE A GOOD DAY ON MY PART. MY WRITING IS TO REQUEST FORMALLY THE USE OF YOUR CHIMERA SOFTWARE FOR ACADEMIC USE I AM A STUDENT OF CHEMISTRY AT A UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AMERICA EXPERIENCED IN COLOMBIA TODAY, COLLEGES WOULD HAVE A WEBINAR ON THE USE OF THEIR SOFTWARE IN INVESTIGATION YOUR GRADE PROJECTS. I WANTED TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS THE SOFTWARE, THEY COULD TELL ME HOW TO DOWNLOAD IT SINCE THE AUTOMATIC DOWNLOAD METHOD IS NOT GIVEN TO ME UNA RAZON MIL OPORTUNIDADES

2 1

Error
by Reshu Kunche 25 Jul '20

25 Jul '20

While opening the file showing error while opening it what the reason

1 0

Electrostatic Potential Calculations Using Coulomb's Law
by Arth Patel 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

Hello Everyone, I have a .pqr file generated using the APBS website and I want to calculate the electrostatic potential for each atom of the proteins using this. I did this using the surface analysis --> Coulombic Surface on Chimera. As part of my current research I am supposed to write a code on python for the same but when I compare the results, I am getting different results. Can someone please explain how to calculate the atom electrostatic potentials from a .pqr file theoretically? Thanks, Arth

2 3

Crystallographic Map Expansion
by Jessica Bruhn 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

Hi, I am trying to open a map generated by microED. I generated a SigmaA map in coot based on an fcf file generated by SHELXL (see attached). I can open it in Chimera and things look reasonable. I am wondering if it is possible to expand the density map beyond the boundaries of the available box using the crystallographic symmetry? Additionally, I am a bit confused by the size of the box. I would have expected it to have the dimensions of the unit cell or the asymmetric unit, but it does not appear to be either of those. The map does appear to be scaled properly. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jessica -- Jessica Bruhn, Ph.D Principal Scientist NanoImaging Services, Inc. 4940 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite 115 San Diego, CA 92121 Phone #: (888) 675-8261 www.nanoimagingservices.com

2 2

How to avoid ”designate file type“ while opening a file
by Gong, Zhen 23 Jul '20

23 Jul '20

Hi, When I click on “file”, then “open”, no matter what types of files I am opening, there would be a window asking me to “designate file type”. This window came up very recently on my Chimera 1.13. Then I updated to Chimera 1.14 but still have this problem. Does anyone know how to avoid this? Many many thanks. Best, Zhen

2 1

Large scale drug screening with chimera
by 최근호 22 Jul '20

22 Jul '20

Dear officer, I am geunho choi from korea. I am doing a docking simulation through chimera. My work is done in the order of dock prep -> autodock vina. If I need to docking 1 protein and 500 drugs, is there a way to docking it all at once? I really appreciate it if you help me. regards, geunho choi

2 1

Interpretation of fitmap translation vector
by Benjamin Basanta 21 Jul '20

21 Jul '20

Hi, I am trying to implement a python script that takes a rotation matrix and a translation vector from Chimeras' fitmap output, and applies those rotations and translations to particle 2D projections from electron micrographs. I have successfully applied the reverse rotation, getting 3D reconstructions that are almost aligned, except for the translation. I am having problems interpreting the values of the translation vector (4th column from fitmap output matrix). According to information I found online the units of this vector are angstroms, but the length of the translation vector output by fitmap would put my density near the edge of the particle box. My interpretation of the tranlation vector is the following: original_position + trans_vec = new_position. For example, I have two densities (box size 264^3, angpix correctly set to 1.15Å), both near the center of the box, fitmap aligns them with what is clearly a small translation after rotation, yet I get the following fitmap output, with a translation vector of length >180Å: > fitmap #1 #0 search 50 Found 34 unique fits from 50 random placements having fraction of points inside contour >= 0.100 (50 of 50). Correlations and times found: 0.9847 (1), 0.9722 (5), 0.9523 (3), 0.9044 (2), 0.8574 (2), 0.8567 (2), 0.8534 (1), 0.8503 (2), 0.849 (2), 0.832 (2), 0.8317 (2), 0.8274 (1), 0.8225 (3), 0.8205 (1), 0.8184 (1), 0.8062 (1), 0.8058 (1), 0.8043 (2), 0.8017 (1), 0.8007 (1), 0.7977 (1), 0.7809 (1), 0.78 (1), 0.7761 (1), 0.7566 (1), 0.7557 (1), 0.7555 (1), 0.7467 (1), 0.7431 (1), 0.7145 (1), 0.7062 (1), 0.6922 (1), 0.6049 (1), 0.6015 (1) Best fit found: Fit map run_it025_class003.mrc in map run_it025_class002.mrc using 70798 points correlation = 0.9847, correlation about mean = 0.6976, overlap = 38.71 steps = 448, shift = 52.7, angle = 48.4 degrees Position of run_it025_class003.mrc (#1) relative to run_it025_class002.mrc (#0) coordinates: Matrix rotation and translation 0.98449497 -0.14831781 0.09365615 14.82575334 0.15479139 0.48339849 -0.86160636 179.12850738 0.08251833 0.86274430 0.49886170 -54.91381047 Axis 0.98487954 0.00636148 0.17312375 Axis point 0.00000000 137.68459847 125.30174028 Rotation angle (degrees) 61.09376942 Shift along axis 6.23421857 Disallowing fitmap shift outputs an even larger translation, which I find odd: > fitmap #1 #0 search 50 shift false Found 35 unique fits from 50 random placements having fraction of points inside contour >= 0.100 (35 of 50). Correlations and times found: 0.8342 (1), 0.8038 (1), 0.7294 (1), 0.699 (1), 0.6862 (1), 0.685 (1), 0.6602 (1), 0.6548 (1), 0.6403 (1), 0.6318 (1), 0.629 (1), 0.6281 (1), 0.6145 (1), 0.6072 (1), 0.601 (1), 0.582 (1), 0.5695 (1), 0.5682 (1), 0.5529 (1), 0.544 (1), 0.5386 (1), 0.5317 (1), 0.5225 (1), 0.5152 (1), 0.5049 (1), 0.4984 (1), 0.4933 (1), 0.4718 (1), 0.4715 (1), 0.4698 (1), 0.4515 (1), 0.44 (1), 0.4243 (1), 0.4102 (1), 0.3598 (1) Best fit found: Fit map run_it025_class003.mrc in map run_it025_class002.mrc using 70798 points correlation = 0.8342, correlation about mean = 0.1402, overlap = 24.51 steps = 224, shift = 3.75e-13, angle = 59.1 degrees Position of run_it025_class003.mrc (#1) relative to run_it025_class002.mrc (#0) coordinates: Matrix rotation and translation -0.99670235 -0.06634245 -0.04672373 320.71861709 -0.08010133 0.71238040 0.69720724 -47.18870041 -0.01296937 0.69865073 -0.71534534 162.45334925 Axis 0.03956990 -0.92529900 -0.37716838 Axis point 158.55880471 0.00000000 92.42576286 Rotation angle (degrees) 178.95488392 Shift along axis -4.91780500 I am clearly missing something, how should I interpret the translation vector output by fitmap? Thank you for your help, Benjamin

2 3

Issues using chimera
by Anna V. Bachmann 21 Jul '20

21 Jul '20

Hello, I am a new user of chimera on MacBook Pro and have been working through the tutorials. In a few sections of the tutorials, it says to ctrl-doubleclick an atom/bond/etc. to get a context menu. I am able to ctrl-click to select as well as shift-ctrl-click to select additional items, but when I attempt to ctrl-doubleclick with my trackpad it behaves the same way as a ctrl-click. Because of this I’ve been unable to complete some of the tutorials. I have not been able to find a solution to this online or in the mouse preferences of chimera. Is there a setting I can change to allow double-clicking on chimera, or is there another way I can show the context menu? Thank you Anna Bachmann Anna Bachmann anna.bachmann(a)centre.edu<mailto:anna.bachmann@centre.edu> Centre College ‘21

2 2

Question about missing segments/pseudobonds
by OLMAN JOSE GOMEZ ESPINOZA 20 Jul '20

20 Jul '20

Dear colleagues, hope your fine well. I have a question about the pseudobonds/missing segments, what those missing segments really mean?. After I performed some docking analysis (using auto dock vina), I used ViewDock to evaluate the results, but I noticed some dotted lines between some atoms in the molecule, so I went to PseudoBond Panel and realized that this dotted lines are missing segments. So I did not understand if this missing segments are a truly chemical bond, or what are they? What would be its importance or relevance for my structure? Thanks in advance for your help Olman Gomez E. --

2 1