May 2025 - ChimeraX-users - RBVI Mailing Lists

ChimeraX version 1.9 has been released
by Elaine Meng 23 Jan '26

23 Jan '26

UCSF ChimeraX version 1.9 has been released! ChimeraX includes user documentation and is free for noncommercial use. Download for Windows, Linux, and MacOS from: https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/download.html Updates since version 1.8 (June 2024) include: - Foldseek search and analysis of large sets of similar structures - Find Cavities tool and "kvfinder" command to identify pockets and channels in macromolecules - optional residue-level summaries of H-bond and contact calculations - "mutationscores" command for analysis and plotting of results from deep mutational scanning - "surface hidefarblobs" command for colocalization analysis of light microscopy channels - raycasting option for medical images or other maps displayed as transparent volumes - selection can be expanded to all residues associated with the same column(s) in a sequence alignment - protein structure metadata can be updated with full chain sequences - missing-structure pseudobonds are labeled with the number of missing residues (default, can be turned off in preferences) For details, please see the ChimeraX change log: https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/trac/ChimeraX/wiki/ChangeLog On behalf of the team, Elaine ----- Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. UCSF Chimera(X) team Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of California, San Francisco

3 4

Focus in ChimeraX
by Luca Pellegrini 10 Oct '25

10 Oct '25

Hi, What is the ChimeraX equivalent to the Focus command in Chimera? I have selected a portion of a structure, and would like to bring it into focus without dragging it into view. Also Focus would automatically set the selection as the pivot point. Best wishes, Luca Luca Pellegrini, PhD Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 1GA lp212(a)cam.ac.uk

4 3

Determining Chirality
by steffen＠sthomas.de 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

4 5

Model loops with MODELER in ChimeraX
by Alexandra Zahradnikova 16 Jun '25

16 Jun '25

Hello, I have recently watched a Youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV6jHhxR5T4) about completing loops with Modeller in ChimeraX. However, the structure I want to model is only a part of the actual molecule, and I want to replace one unresolved segment (300 residues long) with 11 glycines. When I upload both, the FASTA file with the sequence as it should look after completion of the loops, and the PDB file of the incomplete structure, I am not able to align them together in order to perform the modelling. - If I use the original PDB file containing the SEQRES part, the association is performed but produces mismatches after the start of the unresolved sequence. - If I use the PDB file without the SEQRES part, I am not able to perform the association. Can anybody help me? Thanks in advance Sasha ________________________________________________________________________ Alexandra Zahradníková, PhD Department of Cell Cardiology Institute of Experimental Endocrinology Biomedical Research Centre SAS Dúbravská cesta 9 845 05 Bratislava Slovakia Mobile: +421 908 069 796

3 6

Labeling chains in MD simulation trajectories of a multimer
by Alexandra Zahradnikova 13 Jun '25

13 Jun '25

Hi All, I am interested in MD simulations of homomultimeric ion channels, which I do in GROMACS. I would like to analyze my output files with ChimeraX but I run into the following problem: The .gro output of the simulation consists of a single chain named /? in ChimeraX. When I open the file in old Chimera, it shows every chain of the original protein separately but with the same name ()

3 9

Comparing Maps
by Abhilash Padavannil 02 Jun '25

02 Jun '25

Hello, I have five different cryoEM maps coming from similar samples. The maps are at different resolutions. I want to compare the density at the region of interest across these maps. How do I normalize the maps say to the first map to make accurate analysis. I know I could scale them using vop scale, but I am wondering which of the parameters I should use. Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Abhilash.

3 4

How to create singlke protein from assembly of 5 individual chains
by Jacek Jagodzinski 29 May '25

29 May '25

Hi, I am medicinal chemist. I used ChimeraX to model missing parts/loops of the protein for which I had cryo-EM structure. It is transmembrane protein consisting of 5 individual chains. I managed to reconstruct missing parts using as a template known sequences of publicly available X-ray structures of proteins and known sequences. I have now a nice assembly of five individual “repaired” proteins perfectly aligned with parts of my cryo-EM structure. However the PDB file of those FIVE individual proteins is not recognized as ONE protein with five separate chains by my other programs. I suppose there is a way to get the result I need, but I cannot find the solution by myself. Can you help? Jacek Jagodzinski, PhD

2 4

Use minimization in chimerax using command line
by TUSHAR GUPTA 29 May '25

29 May '25

Good morning I would like to appreciate your work and efforts in developing and maintaining ChimeraX, it has always been so useful tool in my research. I was initially using Chimera that had excellent feature of using amber force field for energy minimization of structure and making movie using topology and coordinate file. I am working on inducing mutation in nucleic acid and protein structures. I wish to incorporate the minimization step in my research using Chimerax. I will be highly grateful if you could guide me how can I use minimization steps in Chimerax using command line codes. Thank you Tushar Gupta PhD biotechnology Bennett University Greater Noida India "He that can have patience can have what he will." - Benjamin Franklin _____________________________________________ Vineet Jain (Chancellor) Inspiration

2 4

Issue in using vop maximum to make composite map
by Dr. Heng Zhou 29 May '25

29 May '25

Dear ChimeraX developers, I have an issue when using vop maximum command to combine two local maps. Map A and Map B have an overlapping area with each other. The hinge point of structural flexibility is at the center of the overlapping area. Therefore, the left part of Map A and the right part of Map B have a better local density quality, which I want to keep in the composite map. But vop maximum did it on the opposite, resulting in a worse local resolution at the edges of the overlapping area (e.g., Region 1 and 2). Technically, this is not an issue of vop maximium itself. In Region 1, Map A has a better local density quality, while Map B has higher values in some voxels. So the composite map has more voxels derived from Map B in Region 1. Vice versa for Region 2. The only solution in my mind is to split both Map A and B at the hinge point, then do vop maximum for only the left part of Map A and the right part of Map B. But this is time-consuming since I have many local maps to combine. I wonder if you have a better solution? I would appreciate it if you could give advices. Thanks! Best regards, Heng Heng Zhou, PhD | Postdoctoral research fellow Stefan Raunser lab | Structural Biochemistry Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology Otto-Hahn-Straße 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany Phone: +49 231-133-2326

5 7

Disulfide bridges
by Pascal Rochaix 28 May '25

28 May '25

Hello, I am a long time user of PyMOL and I am testing ChimeraX for the first time. Is there a simple command to show the disulfide bridges ? It is easy in PyMOL but I don't find it in ChimeraX... Thanks in advance, Pascal Rochaix Protein Scientist www.metafora-biosystems.com<http://www.metafora-biosystems.com> [Logo mail]Pépinière Paris Biotech Santé 29 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques | 75014 Paris | France

3 4