- ChimeraX-users - RBVI Mailing Lists

'scene' functionality in ChimeraX
by Maria Voigt 13 Jun '25

13 Jun '25

Good afternoon, I've started using ChimeraX recently after long time using the old Chimera. I've been teaching myself the command line animation lately. One thing I don't seem to be able to find is whether there is something in Chimera X that is equivalent to the old 'add Scene' from Utilities > Animation. This feature saves the position, the shades, whether assets are shown or hidden. Please let me know, Greetings, Maria -- *MARIA VOIGT* Senior Outreach Coordinator, RCSB Protein Data Bank Research Associate, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 174 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway NJ 08854 P: 848-445-4987 | E: maria(a)rcsb.rutgers.edu rcsb.org <https://www.rcsb.org/> | iqb.rutgers.edu <https://iqb.rutgers.edu/> | facebook <https://www.facebook.com/RCSBPDB> | twitter <https://twitter.com/buildmodels> | youtube <https://www.youtube.com/user/RCSBProteinDataBank>

2 2

How to measure and visualize the distance between two benzene rings in ChimeraX?
by Nan Zhang 11 Jun '25

11 Jun '25

Dear ChimeraX Developers, I am working with a protein-ligand complex where there seems to be a π-stacking interaction. I would like to measure the distance between the benzene ring of an amino acid residue in the protein and the benzene ring of the small molecule ligand. Could you please advise on the specific steps within ChimeraX to perform this measurement and also visualize it (e.g., showing the distance label)? Looking forward to your answer, thank you! Best regards, Nan Nan Zhang zhangnan(a)nankai.edu.cn

2 1

Hiding Centroid markers while keeping distance measurement visible in ChimeraX
by Nan Zhang 11 Jun '25

11 Jun '25

Dear ChimeraX Developers, I'm working on visualizing a protein-ligand complex with potential π-stacking interactions. To measure the distance between the centroids of two benzene rings (one in the protein residue, one in the ligand), I used the following workflow: define centroid1 define centroid2 distance centroid1 centroid2 (to measure and show the distance between the centroids)My issue: When I try to hide centroid1 centroid2 to generate a cleaner image showing only the distance measurement (the dashed line and label), hiding the centroid points also automatically hides the distance object. Question: How can I hide only the centroid markers (points) while keeping the distance measurement (the dashed line and its label) visible for visualization? Is there a specific command or GUI manipulation to separate these visual elements? I'd appreciate any guidance on resolving this. Thank you for your help and your excellent tool. Best regards, Nan Nan Zhang zhangnan(a)nankai.edu.cn

2 1

Eachmodel option for volume?
by Oliver Clarke 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

Hi, Fitmap has a handy "eachmodel true" option, which allows one to fit a bunch of maps or models to a single target map. It would be useful I think to have a similar option in the "volume" command, to allow one to quickly multiply a bunch of maps (e.g. from 3D classification) by a single mask. Cheers Oli

2 2

suggestion: let user specify id of coordset generated by morph command
by Alexis Rohou 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

Hi team, For convenience, especially when scripting, it would be good if the morph command would accept an "id" argument (much like the open command has "id" or combine has "modelId"). This would let the user specify the model id of the coordset created by morph. Current behavior is that the first available (lowest numerical) id is used, which is not easy to keep track of when scripting. Cheers, Alexis

2 2

Edit right mouse labels?
by Oliver Clarke 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

Hi, There is probably an easy way to do this but I could not find it in the GUI. Is there a way to edit labels placed with the right mouse? Currently they only give the residue type and number, there doesn't seem to be a way to edit or configure them in the same way as one can do using the global per-residue labels in Actions>Labels. If it doesn't exist, perhaps a right mouse mode "Edit label" would be useful to complement Label and Move Label? This would be helpful when making a quick movie to show density quality, and would allow one to easily add custom labels without needing to use the CLI. Cheers Oli

2 2

Boltz-2
by Lynne Howell 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

I’m sure it already on your radar – but would love to see Boltz-2 and its ability to predict binding affinity integrated into ChimeraX – as you did for Boltz-1. Thanks L P. Lynne Howell Canada Research Chair (2006-2020) Senior Scientist, Program in Molecular Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children Professor, Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto Office and Mailing address: Room 20-9-715 Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning (PGCRL) 686 Bay St. Toronto ON M5G 0A4 Phone: 416-813-5378 (Internal 305378) Web page: https://lab.research.sickkids.ca/howell/ ________________________________ This e-mail may contain confidential, personal and/or health information(information which may be subject to legal restrictions on use, retention and/or disclosure) for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

3 6

Re: Robust way to setup scene and save image such that zoom and resolution are always the same across different monitors
by Daniel Larsson 09 Jun '25

09 Jun '25

I think what throws you off is the aspect ratio of the ChimeraX window. Add a command to set the size of the window into your workflow. For example: windowsize 800 800 Regards, Daniel From: Samuel Haysom via ChimeraX-users <chimerax-users(a)cgl.ucsf.edu> Reply to: Samuel Haysom <Samuel.Haysom(a)Nxera.life> Date: Monday, 9 June 2025 at 17:10 To: ChimeraX Users Help <chimerax-users(a)cgl.ucsf.edu> Subject: [chimerax-users] Robust way to setup scene and save image such that zoom and resolution are always the same across different monitors Hello, Is there a recommended set of commands to setup a particular view of a molecule and then save an image of that view such that the size of the molecule within the image, the resolution of the image, and the position of the clipping planes will always be the same regardless of what monitor size/resolution it is taken on? Currently I setup an image using the following commands: e.g. view matrix camera 0.98237,-0.066404,-0.17474,86.421,0.014131,-0.90572,0.42363,190.37,-0.1864,-0.41863,-0.88882,-48.082 clip near -10 far 10 position /R:LIG zoom pixel 0.0348 I then save it using: e.g. save 'dir_path/image.png' width 2000 height 2000 supersample 10 transparentBackground False I often will come back to the same cxc script and want to re-render with e.g. a modified pdb file but still want to get exactly the same view. I can then substitute this picture into a figure I've created in e.g. Inkscape without having to resize the image. However I've noticed that often the new image will not have the same zoom (so the model will be bigger and smaller within the total FOV) which means I have to then manually resize it to match what I already have. I've also noticed that if I render on e.g. my laptop rather than my desktop monitors this effects both the zoom as previously mentioned but also the final resolution of the image as this seems tied to the screen resolution. Is there a way to make it so the image will always look the same regardless of hardware etc.? KR, Sam Samuel Haysom<mailto:Samuel.Haysom@nxera.life> Senior Scientist • Protein Sciences Nxera Pharma UK<https://nxera.life/> Limited +44 (0)1223 949201 • Steinmetz Building, Granta Park, Great Abington Cambridge, CB21 6DG, United Kingdom [cid:image001.png@01DBD963.DEF37B10] The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive attention of the addressee stated above and should not be copied or disclosed to any other. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender immediately, make no use of its contents and delete this message from your system. Contact and registered office address: Nxera Pharma UK Limited, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6DG. Company No: 06267989. VARNING: Klicka inte på länkar och öppna inte bilagor om du inte känner igen avsändaren och vet att innehållet är säkert. CAUTION: Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe. _______________________________________________ ChimeraX-users mailing list -- chimerax-users(a)cgl.ucsf.edu To unsubscribe send an email to chimerax-users-leave(a)cgl.ucsf.edu Archives: https://mail.cgl.ucsf.edu/mailman/archives/list/chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu/ När du har kontakt med oss på Uppsala universitet med e-post så innebär det att vi behandlar dina personuppgifter. För att läsa mer om hur vi gör det kan du läsa här: http://www.uu.se/om-uu/dataskydd-personuppgifter/ E-mailing Uppsala University means that we will process your personal data. For more information on how this is performed, please read here: http://www.uu.se/en/about-uu/data-protection-policy

1 0

Robust way to setup scene and save image such that zoom and resolution are always the same across different monitors
by Samuel Haysom 09 Jun '25

09 Jun '25

Hello, Is there a recommended set of commands to setup a particular view of a molecule and then save an image of that view such that the size of the molecule within the image, the resolution of the image, and the position of the clipping planes will always be the same regardless of what monitor size/resolution it is taken on? Currently I setup an image using the following commands: e.g. view matrix camera 0.98237,-0.066404,-0.17474,86.421,0.014131,-0.90572,0.42363,190.37,-0.1864,-0.41863,-0.88882,-48.082 clip near -10 far 10 position /R:LIG zoom pixel 0.0348 I then save it using: e.g. save 'dir_path/image.png' width 2000 height 2000 supersample 10 transparentBackground False I often will come back to the same cxc script and want to re-render with e.g. a modified pdb file but still want to get exactly the same view. I can then substitute this picture into a figure I've created in e.g. Inkscape without having to resize the image. However I've noticed that often the new image will not have the same zoom (so the model will be bigger and smaller within the total FOV) which means I have to then manually resize it to match what I already have. I've also noticed that if I render on e.g. my laptop rather than my desktop monitors this effects both the zoom as previously mentioned but also the final resolution of the image as this seems tied to the screen resolution. Is there a way to make it so the image will always look the same regardless of hardware etc.? KR, Sam Samuel Haysom Senior Scientist • Protein Sciences Nxera Pharma UK Limited +44 (0)1223 949201 • Steinmetz Building, Granta Park, Great Abington Cambridge, CB21 6DG, United Kingdom The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive attention of the addressee stated above and should not be copied or disclosed to any other. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender immediately, make no use of its contents and delete this message from your system. Contact and registered office address: Nxera Pharma UK Limited, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6DG. Company No: 06267989.

1 0

ChimeraX adjacent question about AF2 vs AF3
by David S. Fay 09 Jun '25

09 Jun '25

Greetings, I am curious if others have found AlphaFold3 to be slightly worse or less consistent at predicting protein-protein interactions than AlphaFold2. From the AF3 paper it appeared that they were roughly equivalent, with AF3 perhaps having a slight edge. Certainly when it comes to speed and the handling of large proteins, AF3 is far superior. But over time I’ve found a number of cases where AF2 did a better job based on experimentally supported evidence from our lab. Admittedly, this observation is entirely anecdotal and likely prone to bias. And I get that AF2 may predict some interactions better than AF3 and vice versa. But it’s still makes me wonder and I was curious if others had noticed this pattern or had thoughts on the matter. Thanks in advance. David

2 1