- ChimeraX-users - RBVI Mailing Lists

Problem using pbond
by svle＠tiscali.it 23 May '25

23 May '25

Hi, I would like to use pbond with a pair of atoms. For one of these it is available the model number , the chain ID and the atom serial number. How it is possible to give the atom specification ,having the previous three information, for using it in pbond? Thanks. Saverio

3 5

remotecontrol observations and suggestions
by Roden Deng Luo 23 May '25

23 May '25

Hi, This is to share my observations and practices mainly with people using `remotecontrol xmlrpc`, likely developers. `xmlrpc` has a very high overhead, `remotecontrol rest` with "multipart/form-data" header POST requests should be a better option. First, the REST method can also be used programmatically in scripts or applications fairly easily. I have been sending GET requests using the REST method. Then, I hit "Request-URI Too Long" as I am sending decent sized json data (17KB). Then I tried XML-RPC and realized the frame rate dropped from 58 to 8. The frame rate can be displayed at the status line via `graphics rate true`. Then GPT guided me to try POST with "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" as Content-Type. I got stuck here for a while and found _parse_post <https://github.com/RBVI/ChimeraX/blob/3233aaaf01623ca24bccff7196410401872ce…> returns "fields" in binary and the program could not parse args["command"] <https://github.com/RBVI/ChimeraX/blob/3233aaaf01623ca24bccff7196410401872ce…> as what's inside is b"command". Then I refactored my client to POST with "multipart/form-data" and it worked. More details in my conversations with bots: URL too long: https://chatgpt.com/share/682c856c-174c-8003-bfc9-96fa7e2db0c3 Frame rate cmd: https://chatgpt.com/share/682c8589-2da0-8003-8c14-a59b75927c6b XML-RPC overhead: https://chatgpt.com/share/682c85a7-5f40-8003-8615-095e0a28fccd POST: https://chatgpt.com/share/682c85ca-9938-8003-bb0b-1fb7dd7938ef Best, Roden -- This message and its contents, including attachments are intended solely for the original recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify me immediately and delete this message from your computer system. Any unauthorized use or distribution is prohibited. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

1 0

Commercial vs personal use
by Smith, Timothy 22 May '25

22 May '25

Hello, I previously used ChimeraX for my academic work during my PhD and would like to continue using it for personal use. I do work for a biotech company and while I don't use ChimeraX for work related to my job, I do only have a work issued computer where IT needs to install software. My question is would I still need a commercial license even if I only use it for personal use on my work computer? Thanks, Tim

2 1

1.10 Release Candidates Available Now
by Zach Pearson 22 May '25

22 May '25

Hello ChimeraX users, The first release candidate of ChimeraX 1.10 is available for download today. — Zach

3 3

request help about chimeraX
by Pietro Rizza 21 May '25

21 May '25

hi, thank you for your reply...I hope to explain clearly my problem In attached you will see the file saved with CHIMERA X and I' d like to open my data, in particular SCORE, ENERGY OF POSES in the Biovia Studio DIscover Visualizer....... If you see the second attached.....are reported the several energy of poses (indicated by red arrow) probably I save my data in CHIMERAX IN NOT CORRECT WAY? Why do I not open the energy of poses in Biovia Studio Discover Visualizer? thank you again sincerely Pietro -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Il banner è generato automaticamente dal servizio di posta elettronica dell'Università della Calabria <https://www.unical.it/5x1000>

2 1

Re: request your help about ChimeraX
by Elaine Meng 21 May '25

21 May '25

> On May 21, 2025, at 7:19 AM, Pietro Rizza <pietro.rizza(a)unical.it> wrote: > > Hi Dr Meng > Please you could help me, how do you save the data in CHIMERAX? > How can I save the energy of different poses? > Thanks in advance > Sincerely > Pietro > Hi Pietro, It is better to send questions to the chimerax-users(a)cgl.ucsf.edu address (CC'd here so you don't have to send it again), unless you are including private data. If you send only to me, it may not get answered. I removed your attachment in case it was private, but I see you are using ViewDockX. Of course, the energies and other descriptors of each pose are read from your original input file, so they are already "saved" there, but maybe you are trying to save as a spreadsheet format like CSV? It was not clear from your question. The ViewDockX "Save" button will just save another file that has all of the coordinates as well as the scores (like your original input file). There is no option to save a CSV file from the table, sorry. The only similar possibility is to convert the ViewDockX columns into a model attribute with this recipe <https://rbvi.github.io/chimerax-recipes/vdx_attrs/vdx_attrs.html> ... and then use the "save" command to save an attribute file <https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/save.html#attributes> ... but in my opinion it would be MUCH easier just to process these values from your original input file (the one output by the docking program). You just can't do it with ChimeraX, sorry. Regards, Elaine ----- Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. UCSF Chimera(X) team Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of California, San Francisco

1 0

Questions about alphafold interfaces output discrepancies
by Bruno Hay Mele 21 May '25

21 May '25

Hi! I am dabbling with the alphafold interfaces command, and I cannot make sense of the data. In my user case, the table synthesis produced by the command says: Models Confident pairs #Res1 #Res2 4 23 12 12 opening the best model produces these relevant lines in the log 200 atoms, 188 bonds, 24 residues, 1 model selected alphafold contacts last-opened & /A toAtoms last-opened & /B distance 4.0 maxPae 5.0 Found 14 residue or atom pairs within distance 4 with pae <= 5 in the csv, the same model has these relevant columns: distance, max_pae, num_res1, num_res2, num_interface_res1, 4, 5, 246, 246, 20, num_interface_res2, num_interface_res_pairs, num_confident_pairs, 20, 42, 23, interface_res_num1, interface_res_num2 12 values 12 values I am struggling a bit to reconcile all these numbers. The 24 residues selected by chimera after opening are not anywhere else. I suppose these are #Res1 + #Res2 of the synthesis (and interface_res_num1 + interface_res_num2 in the csv)? Both the log synthesis and the csv report 23 as number of confident pairs, but the log message after opening best model says 14 residues (I assume these are those within the distance/pae constraint?) Why Confident pairs is not #Res1 + #Res2? I am also a little bit puzzled by the csv where I read num_interface_res_pairs = 42 and num_interface_res1, num_interface_res2 20 ( I was expecting either 21,21 for num_interface_res or 40 for num_interface_res_pairs. I attach the prediction I was using for diagnosing the problem. cheers, -- Bruno Hay Mele, PhD 2D-20, Biology Dept., University of Naples Federico II https://github.com/bhym/ | +39 081 67 9118

4 5

Smooth MD script vs morph movie
by Alexander Lee 20 May '25

20 May '25

Dear ChimeraX developers, I have been wondering about the pros/cons between the 2 methods to smoothen a trajectory. If I provide a pdb and an nc trajectory file, I can use the smooth_md python script. If the trajectory originally has 100 frames , there will still be 100 frames after using the script. If I exported my trajectory into separate pdb models and morph between each of them, with the default of 50 frames created between each trajectory frame, there will be 5,001 frames after using the command. While importing many pdb's and morphing them takes longer than importing a trajectory and smoothing it, are there any benefits to using either one over the other? I remember seeing some post-production artifacts in smooth_md python script method like the hydrogens of a lysine being in an odd geometry briefly throughout the smoothed trajectory and am unsure if morph command would do the same. Regards, Alex

4 5

Foldseek
by Lynne Howell 15 May '25

15 May '25

Hi Is there an easy way to export the list of similar PDB structures, the % sequence ID, E-value etc that can be found using FOLDSEEK to an excel file. Thanks in advance L __________________________________________________________________________ P. Lynne Howell Canada Research Chair (2006-2020) Senior Scientist, Program in Molecular Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children Professor, Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto Office and Mailing address: Room 20-9-715 Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning (PGCRL) 686 Bay St. Toronto ON M5G 0A4 Phone: 416-813-5378 (Internal 305378) Web page: https://lab.research.sickkids.ca/howell/ ________________________________ This e-mail may contain confidential, personal and/or health information(information which may be subject to legal restrictions on use, retention and/or disclosure) for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

3 2

Issues with the 1.9 release on macOS
by Zach Pearson 15 May '25

15 May '25

Hello everyone, I just came across a bug report on our ticket tracker regarding a missing SciPy symbol in the 1.9 release. The basic problem is that scipy has two macOS arm64 wheels up, and one is targeting a higher MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET than the other. I think pip ignores this environment variable when selecting packages, so without qualifying that we need the lower deployment target version, pip selects the higher one on our build machines. I fixed this issue a few weeks ago for the 1.10 daily builds, before release candidates went out, so neither of those versions are affected. If you have an ARM Mac and your macOS is less than 14, you should use a daily build or release candidate. You can check your version of macOS by clicking on the Apple logo in the top left, then clicking “About This Mac”. Because we are so close to the 1.10 release, we do not plan to make a 1.9.1 release at this time. Our website will be updated to reflect this information shortly, along with a BlueSky announcement. Thank you, — Zach

1 0